Cited by 3Voice and Speech DisordersSpeech Recognition and SynthesisSpeech and Audio Processing

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Detection of articulation disorders using Empirical Mode Decomposition and neural networks

Georgoulas, George, Georgopoulos, Voula C., Stylios, George D., Stylios, Chrysostomos D.·2009·2009 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks

Abstract

This paper introduces a novel approach based on signal processing methods to extract features from speech signals and based on them to detect a specific type of articulation disorders. Articulation, in effect, is the specific and characteristic way that an individual produces the speech sounds. Empirical Mode Decomposition and the Hilbert Huang transform are applied to the speech signal in order to calculate the marginal spectrum of the signal. The marginal spectrum is subsequently subject to a mel-cepstrum like processing to extract features which are fed to a neural network classifier responsible for the identification of the articulation disorder. Our preliminary results suggest that this approach is very promising for the detection of the disorder under study.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/ijcnn.2009.5178935

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. breiman, 1984, Classification and Regression Trees
  2. 10.1109/TASSP.1980.1163420 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 0, Speech processing Toolbox for Matlab
  4. theodoridis, 2008, Pattern Recognition
  5. rabiner, 1993, Fundamentals of speech recognition
  6. 10.1002/9780470148150 · DOI
  7. 10.1109/ICDAR.2003.1227801 · DOI
  8. haykin, 1999, Neural Networks A Comprehensive Foundation
  9. bishop, 1995, Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition
  10. georgopoulos, 2001, a computer based speech therapy system for articulation disorders, Proc 4th Int Conf Neural Networks and Expert Systems in Medicine and Healthcare (NNESMED), 223
  11. 10.1023/A:1009752403260 · DOI
  12. bauman-waengler, 2000, Articulatory and Phonological Impairments A Clinical Focus
  13. 1993, definitions of communication disorders and variations, ASHA, 35, 40
  14. georgoulas, 2008, Investigating Articulation Disorders Using Empirical Mode Decomposition ESBME
  15. 10.1098/rspa.1998.0193 · DOI
  16. kawahara, 2000, accurate vocal event detection method based on a fixed-point to weighted average group delay, Proc of ICSLP, 4, 664
  17. 10.1109/89.701359 · DOI
  18. rilling, 2003, on empirical mode decomposition and its algorithms, Proc IEEE-EURASIP Workshop on Nonlinear Signal and Image Processing NSIP03

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Georgoulas, G., Georgopoulos, V. C., Stylios, G. D., & Stylios, C. D.
Affiliations
  • Technological Educational Institute of the Ionian Islands (GR)
  • Technological Educational Institute of Epirus (GR)
Venue
2009 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2009-06
Volume
35
Pages
959-964
ISSN
2161-4407 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2097409787
Cited by
3
References
0
Citations by year
2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
6.50
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Voice and Speech Disorders
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech Recognition and Synthesis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Speech and Audio Processing
Keywords
articulation disorders, speech processing, empirical mode decomposition, Hilbert-Huang transform, marginal spectrum, mel-cepstrum, feature extraction, neural network classification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review