Cited by 13Authorship Attribution and ProfilingTopic ModelingText and Document Classification Technologies

A deep fusion model for human $vs$. Machine-generated essay classification

Corizzo, Roberto, Leal-Arenas, Sebastian·2023·2023 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN)

Abstract

Essay classification is a crucially important task, considering the increasing attention towards AI tools such as ChatGPT, and the raised concerns with regard to academic integrity. Existing text classification approaches, including neural network-based methods and feature-based methods, are often unable to effectively analyze diverse types of information in a combined way. Moreover, they are mostly tailored for English data, and focus on addressing specific topics, such as fake news, hate speech, and misinformation. On the other hand, machine learning research conducted on essay data has been limited to automated grading and off-topic detection tasks. In this paper, we propose a deep neural network-based model that combines text modeling and linguistic features via data fusion, with the aim to provide robust classification capabilities. Our experiments with datasets containing short essays in English and Spanish written by L2 learners, show that it is possible to accurately perform essay classification, and that our model is competitive, even when compared to popular feature-based and neural network-based approaches.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/ijcnn54540.2023.10191322

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Corizzo and Leal-Arenas (2023) integrated text modeling with a variety of linguistic features through data fusion techniques, achieving F1-Scores of 98.36% on English and 98.29% on Spanish datasets.

    “Other work integrated text modeling with a variety of linguistic features through data fusion techniques (Corizzo and Leal-Arenas 2023), which included different types of punctuation marks, the use of the Oxford comma, paragraph structures, average sentence length, the repetitiveness of high-frequency words, and sentiment scores. On English and Spanish datasets, this approach achieved F1-Scores of”

    From A Survey on LLM-Generated Text Detection: Necessity, Methods, and Future Directions (2025) · cites this paper as Corizzo and Leal-Arenas 2023

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 39 · Cited by 13

Authors
Corizzo, R., & Leal-Arenas, S.
Affiliations
  • American University (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
Venue
2023 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2023-06-18
Pages
1-10
ISSN
2161-4407 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4385488586
Cited by
13
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3
FWCI
2.31
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Authorship Attribution and Profiling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Text and Document Classification Technologies
Keywords
ChatGPT, academic integrity, deep neural network, second language learners, Spanish essay, English essays, AI-generated text detection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review