The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Multi-Truth Discovery While Being Aware of Unbalanced Data Distribution
Abstract
Due to information explosion, conflicting data on the same object among multiple sources is ubiquitous on the Web. To solve those conflicts while estimating source reliability, truth discovery has become a hot topic. However, when considering multi-value objects, the inevitable unbalanced data distribution is overlooked by the existing approaches. In particular, only a few sources make lots of claims while most sources only provide a few claims, which renders the source reliability estimated for “small” sources totally random; Some objects are covered by plenty of sources while some objects are claimed by only a few sources, which causes the value correctness calculated for “cold” objects unreasonable. To tackle the unbalanced data where multi-value objects exist, we propose a confidence interval based approach (CIMTD). We estimate source reliability from two aspects, i.e., the ability to claim the correct number of value(s) and specific value(s) on an object. To reflect the real reliability for both “big” and “small” sources, confidence intervals of enriched estimation are considered. While estimating source reliability, uncertainty degrees are introduced to model object differences. Confidence intervals are also considered to reflect the real uncertainty for both “hot” and “cold” objects. Experimental results on two real-world datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
Research works printed but not linked: 23
- 10.1145/2897350.2897352 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.knosys.2019.03.027 · DOI
- 10.1109/TKDE.2018.2837026 · DOI
- 10.1109/TKDE.2019.2936189 · DOI
- 10.1145/3394486.3403102 · DOI
- 10.14778/2168651.2168656 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1145/2806416.2806443 · DOI
- 10.1145/2983323.2983791 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11280-018-0629-3 · DOI
- 10.1145/3187009.3177739 · DOI
- 10.14778/2735496.2735505 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1145/2588555.2593674 · DOI
- 10.1145/1718487.1718504 · DOI
- 10.1109/ICDM.2017.60 · DOI
- Pasternack, 2010, Knowing what to believe (when you already know something), 877
- 10.1016/j.knosys.2018.12.004 · DOI
- 10.1109/TKDE.2020.2982393 · DOI
- 10.14778/1920841.1921008 · DOI
- 10.14778/2535568.2448943 · DOI
- 10.1109/TKDE.2007.190745 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.14778/1687627.1687690 · DOI · Paper page
- Zhao, 2012, A probabilistic model for estimating real-valued truth from conflicting sources
- 10.1145/2588555.2610509 · DOI · Paper page
Metadata
- Authors
- Fang, X. S., Sheng, Q. Z., Sun, G., Chang, S., Wang, H., & Yang, J.
- Venue
- 2023 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2023-06-18
- Pages
- 1-10
- Cited by
- 0
- Funders
- Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (22D111207)
- Natural Science Foundation of China (61972081)
- Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai (22ZR1400200,22ZR1402000)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multi-Truth Discovery While Being Aware of Unbalanced Data Distribution. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/ijcnn54540.2023.10191906
- The paper
- Fang, X. S., Sheng, Q. Z., Sun, G., Chang, S., Wang, H., & Yang, J. (2023). Multi-Truth Discovery While Being Aware of Unbalanced Data Distribution. 2023 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN). https://doi.org/10.1109/ijcnn54540.2023.10191906
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.