Efficient variants of the ICP algorithm
Abstract
The ICP (Iterative Closest Point) algorithm is widely used for geometric alignment of three-dimensional models when an initial estimate of the relative pose is known. Many variants of ICP have been proposed, affecting all phases of the algorithm from the selection and matching of points to the minimization strategy. We enumerate and classify many of these variants, and evaluate their effect on the speed with which the correct alignment is reached. In order to improve convergence for nearly-flat meshes with small features, such as inscribed surfaces, we introduce a new variant based on uniform sampling of the space of normals. We conclude by proposing a combination of ICP variants optimized for high speed. We demonstrate an implementation that is able to align two range images in a few tens of milliseconds, assuming a good initial guess. This capability has potential application to real-time 3D model acquisition and model-based tracking.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 31 · Cited by 3,945
- Authors
- Rusinkiewicz, S., & Levoy, M.
- Affiliations
- Stanford University (US)
- ORCID
- Rusinkiewicz, S.
- Venue
- Proceedings Third International Conference on 3-D Digital Imaging and Modeling
- Publisher
- IEEE Comput. Soc
- Published
- 2002-11-13
- Pages
- 145-152
- ISSN
- 1550-6185 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2119851068
- Cited by
- 3,945
- References
- 31
- Citations by year
- 2026: 99 · 2025: 182 · 2024: 228 · 2023: 208 · 2022: 194 · 2021: 212 · 2020: 184 · 2019: 208 · 2018: 220 · 2017: 207 · 2016: 210 · 2015: 217 · 2014: 219 · 2013: 192 · 2012: 191
- FWCI
- 107.52
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Conference on 3-D Digital Imaging and Modeling (3DIM) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geology › 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design › Computer Graphics and Visualization Techniques
- Keywords
- iterative closest point, 3D model alignment, point matching, convergence rate, depth images, model-based tracking
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review