Cited by 3,9453D Shape Modeling and Analysis3D Surveying and Cultural HeritageComputer Graphics and Visualization Techniques

Efficient variants of the ICP algorithm

Rusinkiewicz, S., Levoy, M.·2002·Proceedings Third International Conference on 3-D Digital Imaging and Modeling

Abstract

The ICP (Iterative Closest Point) algorithm is widely used for geometric alignment of three-dimensional models when an initial estimate of the relative pose is known. Many variants of ICP have been proposed, affecting all phases of the algorithm from the selection and matching of points to the minimization strategy. We enumerate and classify many of these variants, and evaluate their effect on the speed with which the correct alignment is reached. In order to improve convergence for nearly-flat meshes with small features, such as inscribed surfaces, we introduce a new variant based on uniform sampling of the space of normals. We conclude by proposing a combination of ICP variants optimized for high speed. We demonstrate an implementation that is able to align two range images in a few tens of milliseconds, assuming a good initial guess. This capability has potential application to real-time 3D model acquisition and model-based tracking.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/im.2001.924423

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 31 · Cited by 3,945

Authors
Rusinkiewicz, S., & Levoy, M.
Affiliations
Stanford University (US)
Venue
Proceedings Third International Conference on 3-D Digital Imaging and Modeling
Published
2002-11-13
Pages
145-152
ISSN
1550-6185 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2119851068
Cited by
3,945
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 99 · 2025: 182 · 2024: 228 · 2023: 208 · 2022: 194 · 2021: 212 · 2020: 184 · 2019: 208 · 2018: 220 · 2017: 207 · 2016: 210 · 2015: 217 · 2014: 219 · 2013: 192 · 2012: 191
FWCI
107.52
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Conference on 3-D Digital Imaging and Modeling (3DIM) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geology › 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design › Computer Graphics and Visualization Techniques
Keywords
iterative closest point, 3D model alignment, point matching, convergence rate, depth images, model-based tracking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review