An overview of the 1553 bus with testing and simulation considerations
Abstract
The structure, operation, and protocols of the MIL-STD-1553 avionics bus are examined. The 1553 bus is a very flexible standard that is well-suited for rugged environments requiring computer networking. The standard provides features to control and monitor data transfers to efficiently manage the bus network. Development of a 1553 system is cost-effective because of the abundance of commercial equipment, especially VLSI chips for interfacing the computer to the bus. Off-the-shelf test and simulation equipment greatly eases the development, integration, and troubleshooting of 1553 systems, but a total evaluation of system requirements should be made before any procurement decisions.>
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The distribution of datasets shows a strong reliance on SWaT and WADI for benchmarking prediction-residual-based methods, with additional evidence from custom-built avionics, robotics, temperature-control, offshore wind farm, and simulation-based CPS testbeds.
“Finally, the distribution of datasets shows a strong reliance on SWaT and WADI for benchmarking prediction-residual-based methods, with additional evidence from custombuilt avionics, robotics, temperature-control, offshore wind farm, and simulation-based CPS testbeds [67-73,75,76].”
From AI-Based Anomaly Detection in Industrial Control and Cyber–Physical Systems: A Data-Type-Oriented Systematic Review (2025) · cites this paper as [71]
Process data are particularly suitable for attacks that perturb the physical process state while keeping network-level statistics relatively unchanged, such as false data injection, malicious command or parameter manipulation, process-oriented attacks, and stealthy drifts in sensor trajectories.
“First, process data are particularly suitable for attacks that perturb the physical process state while keeping network-level statistics relatively unchanged-such as false data injection, malicious command or parameter manipulation, process-oriented attacks, and stealthy drifts in sensor trajectories [67,69-73,75,76].”
From AI-Based Anomaly Detection in Industrial Control and Cyber–Physical Systems: A Data-Type-Oriented Systematic Review (2025) · cites this paper as [71]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hong, A. E., Malinovsky, P. P., & Damodaran, S. K. (2024) · Digital Threats: Research and Practice · doi:10.1145/3604434 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
- Authors
- Schuh, R. A.
- Affiliations
- Loral (United States) (US)
- Corresponding author
- Schuh, R.A.
- Venue
- 1988. IMTC-88. 5th IEEE Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2003-01-06
- Pages
- 20-25
- ISSN
- 1091-5281 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1887144030
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 0.43
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Conference proceedings - IEEE Instrumentation/Measurement Technology Conference (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Embedded Systems and FPGA Applications
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Embedded Systems and FPGA Design
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Space Technology and Applications
- Keywords
- MIL-STD-1553, military avionics, bus protocol, system simulation, computer networks
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
