Cited by 10Artificial Intelligence in EducationEducational Innovations and ChallengesArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education

Unraveling the Drivers of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Adoption in Higher Education

Rodzi, Zahari Md, Rahman, Azizah Abd, Razali, Iffah Najihah, Nazri, Irfan Suri Mohd, Abd Gani, Abdul Fattah·2023·2023 International Conference on University Teaching and Learning (InCULT)

Abstract

In the unfolding era of digital transformation, the integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in educational domains poses both unprecedented opportunities and challenges. As educational institutions globally grapple with the nuances of embedding AI into pedagogical frameworks, a pressing issue emerges: What drives the adoption of AI in these settings? This study was conducted out of the exigency to understand these drivers, and navigating the intricacies of AI acceptance among higher education stakeholders. The core research question (RQ) guiding this endeavor is: “What factors predominantly influence the decision to adopt AI tools and methodologies in higher education?” Building upon data collected from 100 students via convenience sampling, regression analysis was employed to probe deeper into the dynamics. Preliminary insights underscored Cost-Effectiveness, Accessibility, and Customization as pivotal drivers, while Learning Outcomes, Efficient Learning, Adaptability, and Career Readiness registered lesser influence. Notably, the model's R2 values, signifying approximately 56.3% (Cox & Snell R Square) and 94% (Nagelkerke R Square) of the variance in AI adoption, highlighted a moderate influence of the designated variables. The model's integrity was further bolstered by the Hosmer-Lemeshow test, yielding a p-value of. 999. These findings form the bedrock for an upcoming, more granular exploration, utilizing the Decision-Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL) method, to discern the intricate causal pathways in the narrative of AI's integration in higher education.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/incult59088.2023.10482651

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 21 · Cited by 10

Authors
Rodzi, Z. M., Rahman, A. A., Razali, I. N., Nazri, I. S. M., & Abd Gani, A. F.
Affiliations
  • Universiti Teknologi MARA (MY)
  • Kolej Pengajian Pengkomputeran, Informatik dan Matematik, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Cawangan Negeri Sembilan, Kampus,Seremban,Malaysia,70300
Venue
2023 International Conference on University Teaching and Learning (InCULT)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2023-10-18
Pages
1-6
OpenAlex
W4393406483
Cited by
10
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2
FWCI
2.57
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Conference on University Teaching and Learning (InCULT) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Innovations and Challenges
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Keywords
artificial intelligence adoption, higher education, artificial intelligence in education, adoption factors, cost-effectiveness, accessibility, customization, student perceptions, digitalization of education, DEMATEL

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review