Cited by 53Advanced Manufacturing and Logistics OptimizationDigital Transformation in IndustryScheduling and Optimization Algorithms

The DOI matches its Crossref record; its reference list is not available.

Optimizing the Scheduling of Autonomous Guided Vehicle in a Manufacturing Process

Yao, Fengjia, Keller, Alexander, Ahmad, Mussawar, Ahmad, Bilal, Harrison, Robert, Colombo, Armando Walter·2018·2018 IEEE 16th International Conference on Industrial Informatics (INDIN)

Abstract

Autonomous Guided Vehicles (AGVs) are considered as one of the key enablers of smart factories which make possible smart and flexible transportation of pallets and material on shopfloor. However, existing AGV fleet management solutions often suffer from poor integration with real-time manufacturing operations information systems, which negatively affects scheduling of AGVs. To exploit the full potential of AGVs in achieving just-intime (JIT) transportation, there is a need for intelligent AGV fleet management system which not only integrate with manufacturing information technology (IT) and operational technology (OT) but also provide prediction for the shop-floor logistic based on real-time manufacturing operations information to optimize scheduling of AGVs. This paper presents an approach for a Smart AGV Management System (SAMS), which combines the real-time data analysis and digital twin models that can be deployed within complex manufacturing environments for optimized scheduling. For a proof of concept, a case study of a line side supply of components to a manual assembly station is presented.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/indin.2018.8471979

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In alignment with machine states found in literature, the identified states in the stations of the laboratory are Idle, Working, Energy-saving mode, and Fault.

    “In alignment with the machine states found in literature, the identified states in the stations of the laboratory are [81]:”

    From Review of digital twin applications in manufacturing (2019) · cites this paper as [81]

Citations

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 11 · Cited by 53

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. srivastava, 2008, Development of an intelligent agentbased AGV controller for a flexible manufacturing system, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 36 7 8, 780, 10.1007/s00170-006-0892-9 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/B978-0-444-63965-3.50382-2 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/j.mechatronics.2017.04.005 · DOI
  4. 2018, COMAUS FIRST AGV A FLEXIBLE SOLUTION FOR THE SMART FACTORY
  5. 2018, KUKA NavigationSolution
  6. 2018, SUPERVISION / FLEET MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE
  7. 2018, SGV Manager
  8. 2018, AGV SUPERVISION SYSTEM AGV MANAGER
  9. 2018, AGV management software for transport management and traffic control of automated guided vehicles, AGV management software for traffic control & transport management
  10. 2018, System VM, System Management Controls for AGV/AGC Systems
  11. grieves, 2014, Digital Twin Manufacturing Excellence Through Virtual Factory Replication
  12. ullrich, 2015, The History of Automated Guided Vehicle Systems, Automated Guided Vehicle Systems, 1
  13. coronado, 2018, Part data integration in the Shop Floor Digital Twin: Mobile and cloud technologies to enable a manufacturing execution system, Journal of Manufacturing Systems
  14. 0, White Paper - Digital Twins for IoT Applications 2018 Digital Twins for IoT Applications
  15. bottani, 2017, From the Cyber-Physical System to the Digital Twin: the process development for behaviour modelling of a Cyber Guided Vehicle in M2M logic, XXII Summer School Francesco TurcoIndustrial Systems Engineering, 1
  16. 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2793265 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1155/2016/3159805 · DOI
  18. 10.1007/978-3-658-16502-4_3 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.06.036 · DOI
  20. 10.1007/s10845-014-0976-6 · DOI
  21. banwell, 0, Adept Lynx Platform Users Guide, 5960, 11970

Metadata

Authors
Yao, F., Keller, A., Ahmad, M., Ahmad, B., Harrison, R., & Colombo, A. W.
Affiliations
University of Warwick (GB)
Venue
2018 IEEE 16th International Conference on Industrial Informatics (INDIN)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2018-07
Pages
264-269
ISSN
1935-4576 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2894225858
Cited by
53
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 5
FWCI
9.43
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE International Conference on Industrial Informatics (INDIN) (publishedVersion)
  • Hochschulschriftenserver der Hochschule Emden/Leer (submittedVersion)
  • Warwick Research Archive Portal (University of Warwick) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/K018191/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Advanced Manufacturing and Logistics Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Digital Transformation in Industry
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Scheduling and Optimization Algorithms
Keywords
autonomous guided vehicles, AGV scheduling, smart factory, digital twin, manufacturing information systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review