The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Advanced and authenticated marking schemes for IP traceback
Abstract
Defending against distributed denial-of-service attacks is one of the hardest security problems on the Internet today. One difficulty to thwart these attacks is to trace the source of the attacks because they often use incorrect, or spoofed IP source addresses to disguise the true origin. In this paper, we present two new schemes, the advanced marking scheme and the authenticated marking scheme, which allow the victim to trace-back the approximate origin of spoofed IP packets. Our techniques feature low network and router overhead, and support incremental deployment. In contrast to previous work, our techniques have significantly higher precision (lower false positive rate) and fewer computation overhead for the victim to reconstruct the attack paths under large scale distributed denial-of-service attacks. Furthermore the authenticated marking scheme provides efficient authentication of routers' markings such that even a compromised router cannot forge or tamper markings from other uncompromised routers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ferguson, P., & Senie, D. (1998) · doi:10.17487/rfc2267 · Cited by 381
Cited by
Survey of network-based defense mechanisms countering the DoS and DDoS problems
Peng, T., Leckie, C., & Ramamohanarao, K. (2007) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/1216370.1216373 · Cited by 759
Snoeren, A. C., Partridge, C., Sanchez, L. A., Jones, C. E., Tchakountio, F., Kent, S. T., & Strayer, W. T. (2001) · Proceedings of the 2001 conference on Applications, technologies, architectures, and protocols for computer communications · doi:10.1145/383059.383060 · Cited by 733
An algebraic approach to IP traceback
Dean, D., Franklin, M., & Stubblefield, A. (2002) · ACM Transactions on Information and System Security · doi:10.1145/505586.505588 · Cited by 447
PINT: Probabilistic In-band Network Telemetry
Ben Basat, R., Ramanathan, S., Li, Y., Antichi, G., Yu, M., & Mitzenmacher, M. (2020) · Proceedings of the Annual conference of the ACM Special Interest Group on Data Communication on the applications, technologies, architectures, and protocols for computer communication · doi:10.1145/3387514.3405894 · Cited by 268
Techniques for Cyber Attack Attribution
Wheeler, D. A., & Larsen, G. N. (2003) · doi:10.21236/ada468859 · Cited by 119
Metadata
- Authors
- Song, D. X., & Perrig, A.
- Venue
- Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2001. Conference on Computer Communications. Twentieth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Society (Cat. No.01CH37213)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2002-11-13
- Volume
- 2
- Pages
- 878-886
- OpenAlex
- W2150228605
- Cited by
- 750
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 39.67
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Advanced and authenticated marking schemes for IP traceback. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/infcom.2001.916279
- The paper
- Song, D. X., & Perrig, A. (2002). Advanced and authenticated marking schemes for IP traceback. Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2001. Conference on Computer Communications. Twentieth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Society (Cat. No.01CH37213). https://doi.org/10.1109/infcom.2001.916279
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.