Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 430

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The origin of power laws in Internet topologies revisited

Qian Chen, Hyunseok Chang, Govindan, R., Jamin, S.·2003·Proceedings.Twenty-First Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies

Abstract

C. Faloutsos et al. (see Proc. ACM SIGCOMM, 1999) found that the inter autonomous system (AS) topology exhibits a power-law vertex degree distribution. This result was quite unexpected in the networking community and stirred significant interest in exploring the possible causes of this phenomenon. The work of A.-L. Barabasi and R. Albert (see Science, p.509-512, 1999) and its application to network topology generation in the work of A. Medina et al. (see Proc. MASCOTS, 2001) have explored a promising class of models that yield strict power-law vertex degree distributions. We re-examine the BGP (border gateway protocol) measurements that form the basis for the results reported by Faloutsos et al. We find that by their very nature (i.e., being strictly BGP-based), the data provides a very incomplete picture of Internet connectivity at the AS level. The AS connectivity maps constructed from this data (original maps) typically miss 20-50% or even more of the physical links in AS maps constructed using additional sources (extended maps). Subsequently, we find that while the vertex degree distributions resulting from the extended maps are heavy-tailed, they deviate significantly from a strict power law. Finally, we show that available historical data does not support the connectivity-based dynamics assumed by Barabasi and Albert. Together, our results suggest that the Internet topology at the AS level may well have developed over time following a very different set of growth processes than those proposed by Barabasi and Albert.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/infcom.2002.1019306

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 430

Metadata

Authors
Chen, Q., Chang, H., Govindan, R., & Jamin, S.
Venue
Proceedings.Twenty-First Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2003-06-25
Volume
2
Pages
608-617
OpenAlex
W1920896335
Cited by
430
References
3
FWCI
101.83
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The origin of power laws in Internet topologies revisited. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/infcom.2002.1019306
The paper
Chen, Q., Chang, H., Govindan, R., & Jamin, S. (2003). The origin of power laws in Internet topologies revisited. Proceedings.Twenty-First Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies. https://doi.org/10.1109/infcom.2002.1019306

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.