The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Detecting 802.11 MAC Layer Spoofing Using Received Signal Strength
Abstract
MAC addresses can be easily spoofed in 802.11 wireless LANs. An adversary can exploit this vulnerability to launch a large number of attacks. For example, an attacker may masquerade as a legitimate access point to disrupt network services or to advertise false services, tricking nearby wireless stations. On the other hand, the received signal strength (RSS) is a measurement that is hard to forge arbitrarily and it is highly correlated to the transmitter's location. Assuming the attacker and the victim are separated by a reasonable distance, RSS can be used to differentiate them to detect MAC spoofing, as recently proposed by several researchers. By analyzing the RSS pattern of typical 802.11 transmitters in a 3-floor building covered by 20 air monitors, we observed that the RSS readings followed a mixture of multiple Gaussian distributions. We discovered that this phenomenon was mainly due to antenna diversity, a widely-adopted technique to improve the stability and robustness of wireless connectivity. This observation renders existing approaches ineffective because they assume a single RSS source. We propose an approach based on Gaussian mixture models, building RSS profiles for spoofing detection. Experiments on the same testbed show that our method is robust against antenna diversity and significantly outperforms existing approaches. At a 3% false positive rate, we detect 73.4%, 89.6% and 97.8% of attacks using the three proposed algorithms, based on local statistics of a single AM, combining local results from AMs, and global multi-AM detection, respectively.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Cyber security in the Smart Grid: Survey and challenges
Wang, W., & Lu, Z. (2013) · Computer Networks · doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2012.12.017 · Cited by 1,123
Rogue Access Point Detection: Taxonomy, Challenges, and Future Directions
Alotaibi, B., & Elleithy, K. (2016) · Wireless Personal Communications · doi:10.1007/s11277-016-3390-x · Cited by 47
Masquerading attacks detection in mobile ad hoc networks
Abbas, S., Faisal, M., Ur Rahman, H., Khan, M. Z., Merabti, M., & Khan, A. U. R. (2018) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2018.2872115 · Cited by 28
Metadata
- Authors
- Sheng, Y., Tan, K., Chen, G., Kotz, D., & Campbell, A.
- Venue
- IEEE INFOCOM 2008 - The 27th Conference on Computer Communications
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2008-04
- Pages
- 1768-1776
- OpenAlex
- W2132047492
- Cited by
- 265
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.08
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Detecting 802.11 MAC Layer Spoofing Using Received Signal Strength. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/infocom.2008.239
- The paper
- Sheng, Y., Tan, K., Chen, G., Kotz, D., & Campbell, A. (2008). Detecting 802.11 MAC Layer Spoofing Using Received Signal Strength. IEEE INFOCOM 2008 - The 27th Conference on Computer Communications. https://doi.org/10.1109/infocom.2008.239
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.