Navigating Ethics of AI-Powered Creativity in Midjourney
Abstract
The ethical landscape in relation to AI created in Midjourney is complex terrain incorporating both obstacles as well as opportunities. The transformative role of technology in design as evident demonstrated by the Midjourney – an AI Art Generator, a panoramic artwork. AI-based generated materials are an efficient way of creating individual pieces and enhancing national values thus students’ perception of the traditional items. Nevertheless, this brings a lot of challenges in picture synthesis, thus underscoring the need for biases identification in already trained models. From architectural conceptualization to UI, AI could play a vital role in design with the applications of this platform pointing at such a future. However, it encounters challenges of engaging users and earning their confidence and thus requires the joint initiative on the part of designers and data scientists. The paper stresses on the important role of ethics, laws, and validated results in dealing with the potential benefits and issues associated with the growing use of AI throughout different fields.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
While the tools are praised for their ability to automate repetitive tasks and enhance efficiency, there is a palpable concern about their impact on the integrity of human-authored content.
“While the tools are praised for their ability to automate repetitive tasks and enhance efficiency, there is a palpable concern about their impact on the integrity of human-authored content (Naik et al. 2024; Singh et al. 2024).”
From Generative AI in Game Design: Enhancing Creativity or Constraining Innovation? (2025) · cites this paper as Naik et al. 2024
Concept art that might have taken hours to draft manually could now be created in minutes using tools like Midjourney or DALL·E.
“Concept art that might have taken hours to draft manually could now be created in minutes using tools like Midjourney or DALL·E (Naik et al. 2024).”
From Generative AI in Game Design: Enhancing Creativity or Constraining Innovation? (2025) · cites this paper as Naik et al. 2024
Cites
Students' voices on generative ai: perceptions, benefits, and challenges in higher education
Chan, C. K. Y., & Hu, W. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2305.00290 · Cited by 2,504 · see citing works
Students’ voices on generative AI: perceptions, benefits, and challenges in higher education
Chan, C. K. Y., & Hu, W. (2023) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-023-00411-8 · Cited by 2,301 · see citing works
Why and how to embrace AI such as ChatGPT in your academic life
Lin, Z. (2023) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/sdx3j · Cited by 202 · see citing works
Ethical and methodological challenges in building morally informed AI systems
Hagendorff, T., & Danks, D. (2023) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-022-00188-y · Cited by 36 · see citing works
VerifAI: Verified Generative AI
Tang, N., Yang, C., Fan, J., Cao, L., Luo, Y., & Halevy, A. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2307.02796 · Cited by 12
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Generative AI in Game Design: Enhancing Creativity or Constraining Innovation?
Alharthi, S. A. (2025) · Journal of Intelligence · doi:10.3390/jintelligence13060060 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
“While the tools are praised for their ability to automate repetitive tasks and enhance efficiency, there is a palpable concern about their impact on the integrity of human-authored content (Naik et al. 2024; Singh et al. 2024).”
- Authors
- Naik, T., Gostu, H., & Sharma, R.
- Affiliations
- D Y Patil International University (IN)
- ORCID
- Sharma, Rahul
- Venue
- 2024 3rd International Conference for Innovation in Technology (INOCON)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2024-03-01
- Pages
- 1-6
- OpenAlex
- W4396685085
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 3.65
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Conference for Innovation in Technology (INOCON) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design › Digital Media and Visual Art
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Visual Arts and Performing Arts › Art, Technology, and Culture
- Keywords
- AI ethics, Midjourney, AI-generated art, generative AI in design, algorithmic bias, user trust in AI, AI in architecture, AI regulation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review