Cited by 8Ethics and Social Impacts of AIDigital Media and Visual ArtArt, Technology, and Culture

Navigating Ethics of AI-Powered Creativity in Midjourney

Naik, Tanvi, Gostu, Hrishikumar, Sharma, Rahul·2024·2024 3rd International Conference for Innovation in Technology (INOCON)

Abstract

The ethical landscape in relation to AI created in Midjourney is complex terrain incorporating both obstacles as well as opportunities. The transformative role of technology in design as evident demonstrated by the Midjourney – an AI Art Generator, a panoramic artwork. AI-based generated materials are an efficient way of creating individual pieces and enhancing national values thus students’ perception of the traditional items. Nevertheless, this brings a lot of challenges in picture synthesis, thus underscoring the need for biases identification in already trained models. From architectural conceptualization to UI, AI could play a vital role in design with the applications of this platform pointing at such a future. However, it encounters challenges of engaging users and earning their confidence and thus requires the joint initiative on the part of designers and data scientists. The paper stresses on the important role of ethics, laws, and validated results in dealing with the potential benefits and issues associated with the growing use of AI throughout different fields.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/inocon60754.2024.10511571

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • While the tools are praised for their ability to automate repetitive tasks and enhance efficiency, there is a palpable concern about their impact on the integrity of human-authored content.

    “While the tools are praised for their ability to automate repetitive tasks and enhance efficiency, there is a palpable concern about their impact on the integrity of human-authored content (Naik et al. 2024; Singh et al. 2024).”

    From Generative AI in Game Design: Enhancing Creativity or Constraining Innovation? (2025) · cites this paper as Naik et al. 2024

  • Concept art that might have taken hours to draft manually could now be created in minutes using tools like Midjourney or DALL·E.

    “Concept art that might have taken hours to draft manually could now be created in minutes using tools like Midjourney or DALL·E (Naik et al. 2024).”

    From Generative AI in Game Design: Enhancing Creativity or Constraining Innovation? (2025) · cites this paper as Naik et al. 2024

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Naik, T., Gostu, H., & Sharma, R.
Affiliations
D Y Patil International University (IN)
Venue
2024 3rd International Conference for Innovation in Technology (INOCON)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2024-03-01
Pages
1-6
OpenAlex
W4396685085
Cited by
8
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1
FWCI
3.65
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Conference for Innovation in Technology (INOCON) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design › Digital Media and Visual Art
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Visual Arts and Performing Arts › Art, Technology, and Culture
Keywords
AI ethics, Midjourney, AI-generated art, generative AI in design, algorithmic bias, user trust in AI, AI in architecture, AI regulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review