Cited by 76Digital Transformation in IndustryEnergy Efficiency and ManagementSimulation and Modeling Applications

Digital Twin for Energy Optimization in an SMT-PCB Assembly Line

Karanjkar, Neha, Joglekar, Ashish, Mohanty, Sampad, Prabhu, Venkatesh, Raghunath, D., Sundaresan, Rajesh·2018·2018 IEEE International Conference on Internet of Things and Intelligence System (IOTAIS)

Abstract

This paper presents a case study for the use of an IoT-driven digital twin for energy optimization in an automated Surface Mount Technology (SMT) PCB assembly line containing legacy machines. The line was instrumented with multiple sensors for measuring machine-wise activity and energy consumption. A software platform for data aggregation and a discrete-event digital twin of the line were built entirely using open-source tools. Based on the insights gained from data collected over several days, we propose a buffering-based solution for improving the energy efficiency of the line, and evaluate its impact using simulations of the digital twin. The results show that a 2.7x reduction in the energy consumption is possible via buffer insertion without significantly affecting line throughput.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/iotais.2018.8600830

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Digital twins monitor a machine tool.

    “monitoring a machine tool [30,31]”

    From Review of digital twin applications in manufacturing (2019) · cites this paper as [31]

  • Proposed improvements are reached by reducing energy consumption.

    “The proposed improvements are reached by reducing the energy consumption [37,40]”

    From Review of digital twin applications in manufacturing (2019) · cites this paper as [37]

  • In most reviewed cases, DT are developed on a single scope level.

    “but in most of the cases DT are usually developed on a single scope level, i.e. [24,30,31].”

    From Review of digital twin applications in manufacturing (2019) · cites this paper as [31]

  • In other reviewed cases, the production system is represented with a Discrete Event System (DES) model.

    “in other cases the representation of the production system is done with a Discrete Event System (DES) model [28,37,41,44].”

    From Review of digital twin applications in manufacturing (2019) · cites this paper as [37]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Karanjkar, N., Joglekar, A., Mohanty, S., Prabhu, V., Raghunath, D., & Sundaresan, R.
Affiliations
Robert Bosch (India) (IN)
Venue
2018 IEEE International Conference on Internet of Things and Intelligence System (IOTAIS)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2018-11
Pages
85-89
OpenAlex
W2910716232
Cited by
76
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4
FWCI
9.45
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE International Conference on Internet of Things and Intelligence Systems (IoTaIS) (publishedVersion)
  • NOT FOUND REPOSITORY (Indian Institute of Science Bangalore) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Digital Transformation in Industry
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Energy Efficiency and Management
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Simulation and Modeling Applications
Keywords
digital twin, energy optimization, surface mount technology, Internet of Things, discrete event simulation, buffer insertion, energy consumption, open source software, data aggregation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review