The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Exploring two methods of usability testing: concurrent versus retrospective think-aloud protocols
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“RTA use does not disturb participants during the task [56,66].”
From Impact of Think-Aloud on Eye-Tracking: A Comparison of Concurrent and Retrospective Think-Aloud for Research on Decision-Making in the Game Environment (2020) · cites this paper as [66]
In the citing paper
“The CTA is often associated with reactivity [56,66] that may have a positive impact on the learning process [85,86].”
From Impact of Think-Aloud on Eye-Tracking: A Comparison of Concurrent and Retrospective Think-Aloud for Research on Decision-Making in the Game Environment (2020) · cites this paper as [66]
In the citing paper
“There are other fields, like usability testing [60,62,66] or education [68,84], where CTA has added value.”
From Impact of Think-Aloud on Eye-Tracking: A Comparison of Concurrent and Retrospective Think-Aloud for Research on Decision-Making in the Game Environment (2020) · cites this paper as [66]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data
Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1993) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/5657.001.0001 · Cited by 3,537
A Comparison of Concurrent and Retrospective Verbal Protocol Analysis
Kuusela, H., & Paul, P. (2000) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1423365 · Cited by 408
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- 10.1037/0022-0663.92.3.413 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/00140139508925248 · DOI
- nielsen, 1993, Usability Engineering
- 10.1016/S0020-7373(83)80011-X · DOI
- 10.1109/47.867941 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0740-8188(00)00051-7 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/154193129003401720 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
A Framework for the Evaluation of Digital Musical Instruments
O'Modhrain, S. (2011) · Computer Music Journal · doi:10.1162/comj_a_00038 · Cited by 130
Prokop, M., Pilař, L., & Tichá, I. (2020) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s20102750 · Cited by 48
Metadata
- Authors
- van den Haak, M. J., & de Jong, M. D. T.
- Venue
- IEEE International Professional Communication Conference, 2003. IPCC 2003. Proceedings.
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2003
- Pages
- 3 pp.
- Cited by
- 24
- References
- 2
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
