Cited by 43

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Linpack evaluation on a supercomputer with heterogeneous accelerators

Endo, Toshio, Matsuoka, Satoshi, Nukada, Akira, Maruyama, Naoya·2010·2010 IEEE International Symposium on Parallel & Distributed Processing (IPDPS)

Abstract

We report Linpack benchmark results on the TSUBAME supercomputer, a large scale heterogeneous system equipped with NVIDIA Tesla GPUs and ClearSpeed SIMD accelerators. With all of 10,480 Opteron cores, 640 Xeon cores, 648 ClearSpeed accelerators and 624 NVIDIA Tesla GPUs, we have achieved 87.01TFlops, which is the third record as a heterogeneous system in the world. This paper describes careful tuning and load balancing method required to achieve this performance. On the other hand, since the peak speed is 163 TFlops, the efficiency is 53%, which is lower than other systems. This paper also analyses this gap from the aspect of system architecture.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/ipdps.2010.5470353

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Aggressively using CPU for computation affects its ability to act as a host, which harms performance.

    “Also, aggressively using CPU for computation affects its ability to act as a host, which harms the performance [Endo et al. 2010;Gregg et al. 2010;Sun et al. 2012].”

    From A Survey of CPU-GPU Heterogeneous Computing Techniques (2015) · cites this paper as Endo et al. 2010

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. 10.1145/1542275.1542313 · DOI
  2. 10.1109/SC.2005.42 · DOI
  3. kistler, 2009, Petascale computing with accelerators, Proceedings of ACM Symposium on Principles and Practice of Paralle Computing (PPoPP09), 241, 10.1145/1504176.1504212 · DOI
  4. 10.1145/1513895.1513901 · DOI
  5. endo, 2008, Massive supercomputing coping with heterogeneity of modern accelerators, Proceedings of IEEE International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium (IPDPS08), 10.1109/IPDPS.2008.4536251 · DOI
  6. nukada, 2008, Band-width intensive 3-D FFT kernel for GPUs using CUDA, Proc IEEE/ACM Supercomputing (SC 08)
  7. 10.1109/SC.2008.5214716 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/j.parco.2007.09.002 · DOI
  9. edelkamp, 2009, Parallel state space search on the GPU, Proceedings of Symposium on Combinatorial Search (SoCS 2009)
  10. 10.1109/SC.2008.5214713 · DOI
  11. 10.1109/IPDPS.2009.5161031 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Endo, T., Matsuoka, S., Nukada, A., & Maruyama, N.
Venue
2010 IEEE International Symposium on Parallel & Distributed Processing (IPDPS)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2010
Cited by
43
References
1

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review