Cited by 24Matrix Theory and AlgorithmsParallel Computing and Optimization TechniquesComputer Graphics and Visualization Techniques

Optimizing Krylov Subspace Solvers on Graphics Processing Units

Anzt, Hartwig, Sawyer, William, Tomov, Stanimire, Luszczek, Piotr, Yamazaki, Ichitaro, Dongarra, Jack·2014·2014 IEEE International Parallel & Distributed Processing Symposium Workshops

Abstract

Krylov subspace solvers are often the method of choice when solving sparse linear systems iteratively. At the same time, hardware accelerators such as graphics processing units (GPUs) continue to offer significant floating point performance gains for matrix and vector computations through easy-to-use libraries of computational kernels. However, as these libraries are usually composed of a well optimized but limited set of linear algebra operations, applications that use them often fail to leverage the full potential of the accelerator. In this paper we target the acceleration of the BiCGSTAB solver for GPUs, showing that significant improvement can be achieved by reformulating the method and developing application-specific kernels instead of using the generic CUBLAS library provided by NVIDIA. We propose an implementation that benefits from a significantly reduced number of kernel launches and GPU-host communication events, by means of increased data locality and a simultaneous reduction of multiple scalar products. Using experimental data, we show that, depending on the dominance of the untouched sparse matrix vector products, significant performance improvements can be achieved compared to a reference implementation based on the CUBLAS library. We feel that such optimizations are crucial for the subsequent development of high-level sparse linear algebra libraries.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/ipdpsw.2014.107

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When the baseline omits TF32, any LLM-generated kernel that merely invokes cuBLAS appears to achieve dramatic speedup.

    “When the baseline omits this universally-available optimization, any LLM-generated kernel that merely invokes cuBLAS (Anzt et al., 2014;Kurzak et al., 2016) (NVIDIA's highly-optimized library for matrix operations, which PyTorch calls internally) appears to achieve dramatic speedup.”

    From KernelBench-Verified: Do LLM-Generated Kernels Actually Beat PyTorch? (2026) · cites this paper as Anzt et al., 2014

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Anzt, H., Sawyer, W., Tomov, S., Luszczek, P., Yamazaki, I., & Dongarra, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US)
  • CSCS - Swiss National Supercomputing Centre (CH)
Venue
2014 IEEE International Parallel & Distributed Processing Symposium Workshops
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2014-05
Pages
941-949
ISSN
2164-7062 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2151819818
Cited by
24
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
FWCI
2.52
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE International Symposium on Parallel & Distributed Processing, Workshops and Phd Forum (publishedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Department of Energy
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Matrix Theory and Algorithms
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Hardware and Architecture › Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design › Computer Graphics and Visualization Techniques
Keywords
Krylov subspace methods, BiCGSTAB, GPU acceleration, sparse linear systems, sparse matrix-vector multiplication, data locality, cuBLAS, iterative solvers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review