The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Design considerations for solar energy harvesting wireless embedded systems
Abstract
Sustainable operation of battery powered wireless embedded systems (such as sensor nodes) is a key challenge, and considerable research effort has been devoted to energy optimization of such systems. Environmental energy harvesting, in particular solar based, has emerged as a viable technique to supplement battery supplies. However, designing an efficient solar harvesting system to realize the potential benefits of energy harvesting requires an in-depth understanding of several factors. For example, solar energy supply is highly time varying and may not always be sufficient to power the embedded system. Harvesting components, such as solar panels, and energy storage elements, such as batteries or ultracapacitors, have different voltage-current characteristics, which must be matched to each other as well as the energy requirements of the system to maximize harvesting efficiency. Further, battery non-idealities, such as self-discharge and round trip efficiency, directly affect energy usage and storage decisions. The ability of the system to modulate its power consumption by selectively deactivating its sub-components also impacts the overall power management architecture. This paper describes key issues and tradeoffs which arise in the design of solar energy harvesting, wireless embedded systems and presents the design, implementation, and performance evaluation of Heliomote, our prototype that addresses several of these issues. Experimental results demonstrate that Heliomote, which behaves as a plug-in to the Berkeley/Crossbow motes and autonomously manages energy harvesting and storage, enables near-perpetual, harvesting aware operation of the sensor node.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Human-powered wearable computing
Starner, T. (1996) · IBM Systems Journal · doi:10.1147/sj.353.0618 · Cited by 876
Cited by
Energy Provisioning in Wireless Rechargeable Sensor Networks
He, S., Chen, J., Jiang, F., Yau, D. K. Y., Xing, G., & Sun, Y. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing · doi:10.1109/tmc.2012.161 · Cited by 624
Feasibility of a fully autonomous wireless monitoring system for a wind turbine blade
Esu, O. O., Lloyd, S. D., Flint, J. A., & Watson, S. J. (2016) · Renewable Energy · doi:10.1016/j.renene.2016.05.021 · Cited by 27
Metadata
- Authors
- Raghunathan, V., Kansal, A., Hsu, J., Friedman, J., & Srivastava, M.
- Venue
- IPSN 2005. Fourth International Symposium on Information Processing in Sensor Networks, 2005.
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2005-06-15
- Pages
- 457-462
- OpenAlex
- W2180460518
- Cited by
- 791
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 44.64
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Design considerations for solar energy harvesting wireless embedded systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/ipsn.2005.1440973
- The paper
- Raghunathan, V., Kansal, A., Hsu, J., Friedman, J., & Srivastava, M. (2005). Design considerations for solar energy harvesting wireless embedded systems. IPSN 2005. Fourth International Symposium on Information Processing in Sensor Networks, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1109/ipsn.2005.1440973
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.