Poster Abstract: Embedded ML Pipeline for Precision Agriculture
Abstract
Invariable of the agriculture type (precision, smart, or digital), the monitoring process of factors that increase the crop yield and growth is mostly non-ML, manually structured approaches with practical pain points. In this scenario, to reduce monitoring costs and maintenance efforts, there is a requirement for low-cost semi-autonomous distributed systems that can remotely collect plant data and perform standalone ML-based analytics without depending on cloud servers or the internet. In this work, we provide an embedded ML pipeline, which users can use/follow for end-to-end solution design and implementation for any of their use-cases. To demonstrate the pipeline, we use it to collect image data, train a CNN-based regression algorithm, perform hardware-specific tuning, generate optimized code, and deploy binaries on Sony Spresense setup. The initial testing shows that even the resource-constrained MCU-based Spresense, in real-time (992 ms), high performance (96.2% accuracy, 1.86 cm2RMSE), could analyze a plant in a semi-autonomous environment to predict the leaf area and plant growth.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
This can be challenging in certain locations [115], such as in Africa [18], where internet bandwidth may not be sufficient to support quick transmission to the cloud.
“However, this can be challenging in certain locations [115], such as in Africa [18], where internet bandwidth may not be sufficient to support the quick transmission to the cloud.”
From A Comprehensive Survey on TinyML (2023) · cites this paper as [115]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 3 · Cited by 6
- Authors
- Sheth, D., Sudharsan, B., Breslin, J. G., & Ali, M. I.
- Affiliations
- Edge Impulse,San Jose,California,USA
- Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway (IE)
- Dublin City University (IE)
- Venue
- 2022 21st ACM/IEEE International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2022-05
- Pages
- 527-528
- OpenAlex
- W4285815074
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 2.60
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- ACM/IEEE International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN) (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Science Foundation Ireland (SFI) (16/RC/3918 (Confirm),12/RC/2289_P2 (Insight),16/RC/3835 (VistaMilk))
- European Regional Development Fund
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Smart Agriculture and AI
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Embedded Systems and FPGA Design
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Leaf Properties and Growth Measurement
- Keywords
- embedded machine learning, precision agriculture, plant monitoring, leaf area prediction, plant growth prediction, resource-constrained devices, model optimization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review