Cited by 6Smart Agriculture and AIEmbedded Systems and FPGA DesignLeaf Properties and Growth Measurement

Poster Abstract: Embedded ML Pipeline for Precision Agriculture

Sheth, Dhruv, Sudharsan, Bharath, Breslin, John G., Ali, Muhammad Intizar·2022·2022 21st ACM/IEEE International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN)

Abstract

Invariable of the agriculture type (precision, smart, or digital), the monitoring process of factors that increase the crop yield and growth is mostly non-ML, manually structured approaches with practical pain points. In this scenario, to reduce monitoring costs and maintenance efforts, there is a requirement for low-cost semi-autonomous distributed systems that can remotely collect plant data and perform standalone ML-based analytics without depending on cloud servers or the internet. In this work, we provide an embedded ML pipeline, which users can use/follow for end-to-end solution design and implementation for any of their use-cases. To demonstrate the pipeline, we use it to collect image data, train a CNN-based regression algorithm, perform hardware-specific tuning, generate optimized code, and deploy binaries on Sony Spresense setup. The initial testing shows that even the resource-constrained MCU-based Spresense, in real-time (992 ms), high performance (96.2% accuracy, 1.86 cm2RMSE), could analyze a plant in a semi-autonomous environment to predict the leaf area and plant growth.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/ipsn54338.2022.00064

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This can be challenging in certain locations [115], such as in Africa [18], where internet bandwidth may not be sufficient to support quick transmission to the cloud.

    “However, this can be challenging in certain locations [115], such as in Africa [18], where internet bandwidth may not be sufficient to support the quick transmission to the cloud.”

    From A Comprehensive Survey on TinyML (2023) · cites this paper as [115]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 3 · Cited by 6

Authors
Sheth, D., Sudharsan, B., Breslin, J. G., & Ali, M. I.
Affiliations
  • Edge Impulse,San Jose,California,USA
  • Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway (IE)
  • Dublin City University (IE)
Venue
2022 21st ACM/IEEE International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2022-05
Pages
527-528
OpenAlex
W4285815074
Cited by
6
References
3
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1
FWCI
2.60
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
ACM/IEEE International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN) (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Science Foundation Ireland (SFI) (16/RC/3918 (Confirm),12/RC/2289_P2 (Insight),16/RC/3835 (VistaMilk))
  • European Regional Development Fund
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Smart Agriculture and AI
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Embedded Systems and FPGA Design
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Leaf Properties and Growth Measurement
Keywords
embedded machine learning, precision agriculture, plant monitoring, leaf area prediction, plant growth prediction, resource-constrained devices, model optimization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review