The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Supervised Machine Learning Algorithms for Credit Card Fraudulent Transaction Detection: A Comparative Study
Abstract
The goal of data analytics is to delineate hidden patterns and use them to support informed decisions in a variety of situations. Credit card fraud is escalating significantly with the advancement of the modernized technology and become an easy target for fraudulent. Credit card fraud is a severe problem in the financial service and costs billions of a dollar every year. The design of fraud detection algorithm is a challenging task with the lack of real-world transaction dataset because of confidentiality and the highly imbalanced publicly available datasets. In this paper, we apply different supervised machine learning algorithms to detect credit card fraudulent transaction using a real-world dataset. Furthermore, we employ these algorithms to implement a super classifier using ensemble learning methods. We identify the most important variables that may lead to higher accuracy in credit card fraudulent transaction detection. Additionally, we compare and discuss the performance of various supervised machine learning algorithms exist in literature against the super classifier that we implemented in this paper.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Data mining for credit card fraud: a comparative study
Bhattacharyya, S., Jha, S., Tharakunnel, K., & Westland, J. C. (2011) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2010.08.008 · Cited by 1,108 · cited 1×
“This information comes from tons of sources like social media followers, likes and comments, user’s purchase behaviours[1],[2].”
BackgroundCalibrating Probability with Undersampling for Unbalanced Classification
Pozzolo, A. D., Caelen, O., Johnson, R. A., & Bontempi, G. (2015) · 2015 IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence · doi:10.1109/ssci.2015.33 · Cited by 667
Transaction aggregation as a strategy for credit card fraud detection
Whitrow, C., Hand, D. J., Juszczak, P., Weston, D., & Adams, N. M. (2009) · Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1007/s10618-008-0116-z · Cited by 337
Cited by
Credit Card Fraud Detection - Machine Learning methods
Varmedja, D., Karanovic, M., Sladojevic, S., Arsenovic, M., & Anderla, A. (2019) · 2019 18th International Symposium INFOTEH-JAHORINA (INFOTEH) · doi:10.1109/infoteh.2019.8717766 · Cited by 323
Metadata
- Authors
- Dhankhad, S., Mohammed, E., & Far, B.
- Venue
- 2018 IEEE International Conference on Information Reuse and Integration (IRI)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2018-07
- Pages
- 122-125
- OpenAlex
- W2886330306
- Cited by
- 208
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 8.11
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Supervised Machine Learning Algorithms for Credit Card Fraudulent Transaction Detection: A Comparative Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/iri.2018.00025
- The paper
- Dhankhad, S., Mohammed, E., & Far, B. (2018). Supervised Machine Learning Algorithms for Credit Card Fraudulent Transaction Detection: A Comparative Study. 2018 IEEE International Conference on Information Reuse and Integration (IRI). https://doi.org/10.1109/iri.2018.00025
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.