The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Control delay in Reinforcement Learning for real-time dynamic systems: A memoryless approach
Abstract
Robots controlled by Reinforcement Learning (RL) are still rare. A core challenge to the application of RL to robotic systems is to learn despite the existence of control delay - the delay between measuring a system's state and acting upon it. Control delay is always present in real systems. In this work, we present two novel temporal difference (TD) learning algorithms for problems with control delay. These algorithms improve learning performance by taking the control delay into account. We test our algorithms in a gridworld, where the delay is an integer multiple of the time step, as well as in the simulation of a robotic system, where the delay can have any value. In both tests, our proposed algorithms outperform classical TD learning algorithms, while maintaining low computational complexity.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Separately, in reinforcement learning, a variety of prior works have developed time-delayed decision-making methods [57, 16, 54, 63, 66, 67]. However, these approaches are not always applicable to imitation learning, and none of them leverage action chunking.”
From Real-Time Execution of Action Chunking Flow Policies (2025) · cites this paper as [54]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- 10.1016/B978-1-55860-335-6.50042-8 · DOI
- 10.1109/TNN.1998.712192 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1023/A:1007678930559 · DOI
- loch, 1998, Using eligibility traces to find the best memoryless policy in partially observable markov decision processes, Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Machine Learning, 141
- 10.1109/IROS.2010.5650765 · DOI
- 10.1109/FUZZY.2007.4295497 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10458-008-9056-7 · DOI
- 10.1109/TAC.2003.809799 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Real-Time Execution of Action Chunking Flow Policies
Black, K., Galliker, M., & Levine, S. (2025) · Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 38 · doi:10.52202/085713-1122 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Schuitema, E., Busoniu, L., Babuska, R., & Jonker, P.
- Affiliations
- Delft University of Technology (NL)
- ORCID
- Jonker, P
- Venue
- 2010 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2010-10
- Pages
- 3226-3231
- ISSN
- 2153-0858 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1986278286
- Cited by
- 59
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.78
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Adaptive Dynamic Programming Control
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Simulation Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- control delay, reinforcement learning, temporal difference learning, robot control, grid world, computational complexity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Control delay in Reinforcement Learning for real-time dynamic systems: A memoryless approach. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/iros.2010.5650345
- The paper
- Schuitema, E., Busoniu, L., Babuska, R., & Jonker, P. (2010). Control delay in Reinforcement Learning for real-time dynamic systems: A memoryless approach. 2010 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. https://doi.org/10.1109/iros.2010.5650345
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.