Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 59Reinforcement Learning in RoboticsAdaptive Dynamic Programming ControlSimulation Techniques and Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Control delay in Reinforcement Learning for real-time dynamic systems: A memoryless approach

Schuitema, E, Busoniu, L, Babuska, R, Jonker, P·2010·2010 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems

Abstract

Robots controlled by Reinforcement Learning (RL) are still rare. A core challenge to the application of RL to robotic systems is to learn despite the existence of control delay - the delay between measuring a system's state and acting upon it. Control delay is always present in real systems. In this work, we present two novel temporal difference (TD) learning algorithms for problems with control delay. These algorithms improve learning performance by taking the control delay into account. We test our algorithms in a gridworld, where the delay is an integer multiple of the time step, as well as in the simulation of a robotic system, where the delay can have any value. In both tests, our proposed algorithms outperform classical TD learning algorithms, while maintaining low computational complexity.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/iros.2010.5650345

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. 10.1016/B978-1-55860-335-6.50042-8 · DOI
  2. 10.1109/TNN.1998.712192 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1023/A:1007678930559 · DOI
  4. loch, 1998, Using eligibility traces to find the best memoryless policy in partially observable markov decision processes, Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Machine Learning, 141
  5. 10.1109/IROS.2010.5650765 · DOI
  6. 10.1109/FUZZY.2007.4295497 · DOI
  7. 10.1007/s10458-008-9056-7 · DOI
  8. 10.1109/TAC.2003.809799 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 59

Metadata

Authors
Schuitema, E., Busoniu, L., Babuska, R., & Jonker, P.
Affiliations
Delft University of Technology (NL)
Venue
2010 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2010-10
Pages
3226-3231
ISSN
2153-0858 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1986278286
Cited by
59
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.78
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Adaptive Dynamic Programming Control
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Simulation Techniques and Applications
Keywords
control delay, reinforcement learning, temporal difference learning, robot control, grid world, computational complexity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Control delay in Reinforcement Learning for real-time dynamic systems: A memoryless approach. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/iros.2010.5650345
The paper
Schuitema, E., Busoniu, L., Babuska, R., & Jonker, P. (2010). Control delay in Reinforcement Learning for real-time dynamic systems: A memoryless approach. 2010 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. https://doi.org/10.1109/iros.2010.5650345

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.