Cited by 161Robot Manipulation and LearningReinforcement Learning in RoboticsSoft Robotics and Applications

Learning force control policies for compliant manipulation

Kalakrishnan, Mrinal, Righetti, Ludovic, Pastor, Peter, Schaal, Stefan·2011·2011 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems

Abstract

Developing robots capable of fine manipulation skills is of major importance in order to build truly assistive robots. These robots need to be compliant in their actuation and control in order to operate safely in human environments. Manipulation tasks imply complex contact interactions with the external world, and involve reasoning about the forces and torques to be applied. Planning under contact conditions is usually impractical due to computational complexity, and a lack of precise dynamics models of the environment. We present an approach to acquiring manipulation skills on compliant robots through reinforcement learning. The initial position control policy for manipulation is initialized through kinesthetic demonstration. We augment this policy with a force/torque profile to be controlled in combination with the position trajectories. We use the Policy Improvement with Path Integrals (PI2) algorithm to learn these force/torque profiles by optimizing a cost function that measures task success. We demonstrate our approach on the Barrett WAM robot arm equipped with a 6-DOF force/torque sensor on two different manipulation tasks: opening a door with a lever door handle, and picking up a pen off the table. We show that the learnt force control policies allow successful, robust execution of the tasks.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/iros.2011.6095096

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 17 · Cited by 161

Authors
Kalakrishnan, M., Righetti, L., Pastor, P., & Schaal, S.
Affiliations
University of Southern California (US)
Venue
2011 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2011-09
Pages
4639-4644
ISSN
2153-0858 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2100235553
Cited by
161
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 3
FWCI
11.24
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) (publishedVersion)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robot Manipulation and Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Soft Robotics and Applications
Keywords
force control, compliant manipulation, reinforcement learning, assistive robots, contact interaction, door opening

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review