Light-weight localization for vehicles using road markings
Abstract
Traditional vision-based localization methods such as visual SLAM suffer from practical problems in outdoor environments such as unstable feature detection and inability to perform location recognition under lighting, perspective, weather and appearance change. Additionally map construction on a large scale in these systems presents its own challenges. In this work, we present a novel method for precisely localizing vehicles on the road using signs marked on the road (road markings), which have the advantage of being distinct and easy to detect, their detection being robust under changes in lighting and weather. Our method uses corners detected on road markings to perform localization in global coordinates. The method consists of two phases - a mapping phase when a high-quality GPS device is used to automatically survey road marks and add them to a light-weight “map” or database, and a localization phase where road mark detection and look-up in the map, combined with visual odometry, produces precise localization. We present experiments using a real-time implementation operating in a car that demonstrates the improved localization robustness and accuracy of our system even when using road marks alone. However, in this case the trajectory between road marks has to be filled-in by visual odometry, which contributes drift. Hence, we also present a mechanism for combining road-mark-based maps with sparse feature-based maps that results in greater accuracy still. We see our use of…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Team MIT used a SLAM approach in the DARPA urban challenge and finished fourth.
“Team MIT used a SLAM approach in DARPA urban challenge [113] and finished it in the 4th place.”
From A Survey of Autonomous Driving: <i>Common Practices and Emerging Technologies</i> (2020) · cites this paper as [113]
While not as accurate as the lidar, radar can detect an object at high range and estimate their velocity.
“While not as accurate as the lidar, it can detect at object at high range and estimate their velocity [113].”
From A Survey of Autonomous Driving: <i>Common Practices and Emerging Technologies</i> (2020) · cites this paper as [113]
Cites
Histograms of Oriented Gradients for Human Detection
Dalal, N., & Triggs, B. (2005) · 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2005.177 · Cited by 33,584 · see citing works
Map-Based Precision Vehicle Localization in Urban Environments
Levinson, J., Montemerlo, M., & Thrun, S. (2007) · Robotics: Science and Systems III · doi:10.15607/rss.2007.iii.016 · Cited by 477 · see citing works
Adaptive relative bundle adjustment
Sibley, G., Mei, C., Reid, I., & Newman, P. (2009) · Robotics: Science and Systems V · doi:10.15607/rss.2009.v.023 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Survey of Autonomous Driving: <i>Common Practices and Emerging Technologies</i>
Yurtsever, E., Lambert, J., Carballo, A., & Takeda, K. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2983149 · Cited by 1,889 · see citing works
“computational requirements and environmental challenges, running SLAM algorithms outdoors, which is the operational domain of ADSs, is less efficient than localization with a pre-built map [112].”
Visual localization within LIDAR maps for automated urban driving
Wolcott, R. W., & Eustice, R. M. (2014) · 2014 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems · doi:10.1109/iros.2014.6942558 · Cited by 374 · see citing works
Accurate lateral positioning from map data and road marking detection
Gruyer, D., Belaroussi, R., & Revilloud, M. (2016) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2015.08.015 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
- Authors
- Ranganathan, A., Ilstrup, D., & Wu, T.
- Affiliations
- Honda (United States) (US)
- University of Maryland, College Park (US)
- ORCID
- Tao Wu
- Venue
- 2013 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2013-11
- Pages
- 921-927
- ISSN
- 2153-0858 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2067556683
- Cited by
- 50
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 4.12
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Indoor and Outdoor Localization Technologies
- Keywords
- vehicle localization, road markings, visual odometry, GPS surveying, map fusion, real-time localization, autonomous vehicles
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review