Cited by 50Robotics and Sensor-Based LocalizationAutonomous Vehicle Technology and SafetyIndoor and Outdoor Localization Technologies

Light-weight localization for vehicles using road markings

Ranganathan, Ananth, Ilstrup, David, Tao Wu·2013·2013 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems

Abstract

Traditional vision-based localization methods such as visual SLAM suffer from practical problems in outdoor environments such as unstable feature detection and inability to perform location recognition under lighting, perspective, weather and appearance change. Additionally map construction on a large scale in these systems presents its own challenges. In this work, we present a novel method for precisely localizing vehicles on the road using signs marked on the road (road markings), which have the advantage of being distinct and easy to detect, their detection being robust under changes in lighting and weather. Our method uses corners detected on road markings to perform localization in global coordinates. The method consists of two phases - a mapping phase when a high-quality GPS device is used to automatically survey road marks and add them to a light-weight “map” or database, and a localization phase where road mark detection and look-up in the map, combined with visual odometry, produces precise localization. We present experiments using a real-time implementation operating in a car that demonstrates the improved localization robustness and accuracy of our system even when using road marks alone. However, in this case the trajectory between road marks has to be filled-in by visual odometry, which contributes drift. Hence, we also present a mechanism for combining road-mark-based maps with sparse feature-based maps that results in greater accuracy still. We see our use of…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/iros.2013.6696460

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ranganathan, A., Ilstrup, D., & Wu, T.
Affiliations
  • Honda (United States) (US)
  • University of Maryland, College Park (US)
ORCID
Tao Wu
Venue
2013 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2013-11
Pages
921-927
ISSN
2153-0858 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2067556683
Cited by
50
References
3
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1
FWCI
4.12
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Indoor and Outdoor Localization Technologies
Keywords
vehicle localization, road markings, visual odometry, GPS surveying, map fusion, real-time localization, autonomous vehicles

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review