Cited by 63Advanced Vision and ImagingRobotics and Sensor-Based Localization3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage

Omnidirectional 3D reconstruction in augmented Manhattan worlds

Schonbein, Miriam, Geiger, Andreas·2014·2014 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems

Abstract

This paper proposes a method for high-quality omnidirectional 3D reconstruction of augmented Manhattan worlds from catadioptric stereo video sequences. In contrast to existing works we do not rely on constructing virtual perspective views, but instead propose to optimize depth jointly in a unified omnidirectional space. Furthermore, we show that plane-based prior models can be applied even though planes in 3D do not project to planes in the omnidirectional domain. Towards this goal, we propose an omnidirectional slanted-plane Markov random field model which relies on plane hypotheses extracted using a novel voting scheme for 3D planes in omnidirectional space. To quantitatively evaluate our method we introduce a dataset which we have captured using our autonomous driving platform AnnieWAY which we equipped with two horizontally aligned catadioptric cameras and a Velodyne HDL-64E laser scanner for precise ground truth depth measurements. As evidenced by our experiments, the proposed method clearly benefits from the unified view and significantly outperforms existing stereo matching techniques both quantitatively and qualitatively. Furthermore, our method is able to reduce noise and the obtained depth maps can be represented very compactly by a small number of image segments and plane parameters.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/iros.2014.6942637

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Event cameras have been used for pose estimation and SLAM, visual-inertial odometry and 3D reconstruction.

    “A recent survey outlines progress in pose estimation and SLAM, visual-inertial odometry and 3D reconstruction, as well as other applications [145].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schonbein, M., & Geiger, A.
Affiliations
Max Planck Society (DE)
Venue
2014 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2014-09
Pages
716-723
ISSN
2153-0858 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1989310712
Cited by
63
References
2
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 1
FWCI
2.51
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) (publishedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Vision and Imaging
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geology › 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
Keywords
Manhattan world, depth estimation, Markov random fields, autonomous driving, depth map denoising

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review