The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Encoding formulas as deep networks: Reinforcement learning for zero-shot execution of LTL formulas
Open accessAbstract
We demonstrate a reinforcement learning agent which uses a compositional recurrent neural network that takes as input an LTL formula and determines satisfying actions. The input LTL formulas have never been seen before, yet the network performs zero-shot generalization to satisfy them. This is a novel form of multi-task learning for RL agents where agents learn from one diverse set of tasks and generalize to a new set of diverse tasks. The formulation of the network enables this capacity to generalize. We demonstrate this ability in two domains. In a symbolic domain, the agent finds a sequence of letters that is accepted. In a Minecraft-like environment, the agent finds a sequence of actions that conform to the formula. While prior work could learn to execute one formula reliably given examples of that formula, we demonstrate how to encode all formulas reliably. This could form the basis of new multitask agents that discover sub-tasks and execute them without any additional training, as well as the agents which follow more complex linguistic commands. The structures required for this generalization are specific to LTL formulas, which opens up an interesting theoretical question: what structures are required in neural networks for zero-shot generalization to different logics?
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The alphabet size consists of 889 propositions, which is almost two orders of magnitude larger than the alphabets considered in previous work (Kuo, Katz, and Barbu 2020; Vaezipoor et al. 2021; Yalcinkaya et al. 2024; Jackermeier and Abate 2025).”
From Beyond Fixed Tasks: Unsupervised Environment Design for Task-Level Pairs (2025) · cites this paper as Kuo, Katz, and Barbu 2020
In the citing paper
“The alphabet size consists of 889 propositions, which is almost two orders of magnitude larger than the alphabets considered in previous work (Kuo, Katz, and Barbu 2020; Vaezipoor et al. 2021; Yalcinkaya et al. 2024; Jackermeier and Abate 2025).”
From Beyond Fixed Tasks: Unsupervised Environment Design for Task-Level Pairs (2025) · cites this paper as Kuo, Katz, and Barbu 2020
In the citing paper
“The LTL-conditioned methods proposed by Kuo, Katz, and Barbu (2020) and Jackermeier and Abate (2025) use a handcrafted curriculum that starts with simple tasks and gradually progresses to more complex tasks (e.g., longer formulas) as satisfactory performance is achieved.”
From Beyond Fixed Tasks: Unsupervised Environment Design for Task-Level Pairs (2025) · cites this paper as Kuo, Katz, and Barbu (2020)
In the citing paper
“LTL-conditioned methods (e.g., Kuo, Katz, and Barbu 2020; Vaezipoor et al. 2021; Jackermeier and Abate 2025) typically generate tasks by procedurally sampling LTL formulas combining logical and temporal operators from a context-free grammar.”
From Beyond Fixed Tasks: Unsupervised Environment Design for Task-Level Pairs (2025) · cites this paper as Kuo, Katz, and Barbu 2020
Citations
Cites
Safe Reinforcement Learning via Shielding
Alshiekh, M., Bloem, R., Ehlers, R., Könighofer, B., Niekum, S., & Topcu, U. (2018) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v32i1.11797 · Cited by 37
Research works printed but not linked: 19
- 10.1109/CDC.2014.7039527 · DOI
- 10.1109/IROS.2017.8206234 · DOI
- 10.23919/ACC.2018.8431181 · DOI
- sutton, 2000, Policy gradient methods for reinforcement learning with function approximation, Advances in neural information processing systems, 1057
- mnih, 2016, Asynchronous methods for deep reinforcement learning, International Conference on Machine Learning, 1928
- duret-lutz, 2016, Spot 2.0 — a framework for LTL and ?-automata manipulation, Proceedings of the 14th International Symposium on Automated Technology for Verification and Analysis (ATVA’16), 10.1007/978-3-319-46520-3_8 · DOI
- de giacomo, 2013, Linear temporal logic and linear dynamic logic on finite traces, Twenty-Third International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
- kuo, 2020, Deep compositional robotic planners that follow natural language commands, International Conference on Robotics and Automation
- 10.1016/0004-3702(95)00045-3 · DOI
- tijmen tieleman, 2012, Lecture 6.5-RMSprop, coursera: Neural networks for machine learning, Tech Rep
- 10.24963/ijcai.2019/840 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.15607/RSS.2019.XV.064 · DOI
- toro icarte, 2018, Teaching multiple tasks to an RL agent using LTL, Proc of International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, 452
- sahni, 2017, Learning to compose skills, Proceedings of NIPS 2017 Deep RL Symposium
- 10.15607/RSS.2014.X.039 · DOI
- andreas, 2017, Modular multitask reinforcement learning with policy sketches, Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning-Volume 70, 166
- 10.1109/SFCS.1977.32 · DOI
- 10.1109/IROS.2015.7354078 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3115/v1/W14-4012 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
General agents contain world models
Richens, J., Abel, D., Bellot, A., & Everitt, T. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.01622 · Cited by 30
Beyond Fixed Tasks: Unsupervised Environment Design for Task-Level Pairs
Furelos-Blanco, D., Pert, C., Kelbel, F., Spies, A. F., Russo, A., & Dennis, M. (2025) · arXiv
“However, there has been growing interest in an alternative approach of expressing tasks through formal languages , including temporal logics (Kuo, Katz, and Barbu 2020; Vaezipoor et al. 2021; Qiu, Mao, and Zhu 2023; Jackermeier and Abate 2025) and finite-state machines (Yalcinkaya et al. 2023,…”
Influential
Metadata
- Authors
- Kuo, Y.-L., Katz, B., & Barbu, A.
- Affiliations
- MIT Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (US)
- Venue
- 2020 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2020-10-24
- Pages
- 5604-5610
- ISSN
- 2153-0858 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3132564992
- Cited by
- 21
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2
- FWCI
- 1.05
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Toyota Research Institute
- Siemens
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
- Keywords
- linear temporal logic, zero-shot generalization, reinforcement learning agents, multi-task learning, symbolic reasoning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review