Cited by 17Robot Manipulation and LearningReinforcement Learning in Robotics3D Shape Modeling and Analysis

Graph-based Task-specific Prediction Models for Interactions between Deformable and Rigid Objects

Open access
Weng, Zehang, Paus, Fabian, Varava, Anastasiia, Yin, Hang, Asfour, Tamim, Kragic, Danica·2021·2021 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS)

Abstract

Capturing scene dynamics and predicting the future scene state is challenging but essential for robotic manipulation tasks, especially when the scene contains both rigid and deformable objects. In this work, we contribute a simulation environment and generate a novel dataset for task-specific manipulation, involving interactions between rigid objects and a deformable bag. The dataset incorporates a rich variety of scenarios including different object sizes, object numbers and manipulation actions. We approach dynamics learning by proposing an object-centric graph representation and two modules which are Active Prediction Module (APM) and Position Prediction Module (PPM) based on graph neural networks with an encode-process-decode architecture. At the inference stage, we build a two-stage model based on the learned modules for single time step prediction. We combine modules with different prediction horizons into a mixed-horizon model which addresses long-term prediction. In an ablation study, we show the benefits of the two-stage model for single time step prediction and the effectiveness of the mixed-horizon model for long-term prediction tasks. Supplementary material is available at https://github.com/wengzehang/deformable_rigid_interaction_prediction

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/iros51168.2021.9636660

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Advancements in complex 3D deformable bag manipulation do not incorporate an active movable camera for task achievement.

    “Notably, advancements in complex 3D deformable bag manipulation have been presented [27], [28], [29], [30], [31]. These works have shown significant progress in the domain but do not incorporate an active movable camera for task achievement.”

    From Interactive Perception for Deformable Object Manipulation (2024) · cites this paper as [27]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. Y. Ye, D. Gandhi, A. Gupta, and S. Tulsiani, "Object-centric forward modeling for model predictive control," in Conference on Robot Learning. PMLR, 2020, pp. 100-109.
  2. J. Sanchez, J.-A. Corrales, B.-C. Bouzgarrou, and Y. Mezouar, "Robotic manipulation and sensing of deformable objects in domestic and industrial applications: a survey," The International Journal of Robotics Research, vol. 37, no. 7, pp. 688-716, 2018.
  3. P. W. Battaglia, R. Pascanu, M. Lai, D. Rezende, and K. Kavukcuoglu, "Interaction networks for learning about objects, relations and physics," arXiv preprint arXiv:1612.00222, 2016. · arXiv
  4. X. Lin, Y. Wang, J. Olkin, and D. Held, "Softgym: Benchmarking deep reinforcement learning for deformable object manipulation," arXiv preprint arXiv:2011.07215, 2020. · arXiv
  5. N. Watters, D. Zoran, T. Weber, P. Battaglia, R. Pascanu, and A. Tac- chetti, "Visual interaction networks: Learning a physics simulator from video," in Advances in neural information processing systems, 2017, pp. 4539-4547.
  6. Y. Li, H. He, J. Wu, D. Katabi, and A. Torralba, "Learning compositional koopman operators for model-based control," in International Conference on Learning Representations, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://openreview.net/forum?id=H1ldzA4tPr
  7. Y. C. Hou, K. S. M. Sahari, and D. N. T. How, "A review on modeling of flexible deformable object for dexterous robotic manipulation," International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems, vol. 16, no. 3, p. 1729881419848894, 2019.
  8. M. Yan, Y. Zhu, N. Jin, and J. Bohg, "Self-supervised learning of state estimation for manipulating deformable linear objects," IEEE robotics and automation letters, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 2372-2379, 2020.
  9. Y. J. Oh, T. M. Lee, and I.-K. Lee, "Hierarchical cloth simulation using deep neural networks," in Proceedings of Computer Graphics International 2018, 2018, pp. 139-146.
  10. T. M. Lee, Y. J. Oh, and I.-K. Lee, "Efficient cloth simulation using miniature cloth and upscaling deep neural networks," arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.03953, 2019. · arXiv
  11. D. Hafner, T. Lillicrap, I. Fischer, R. Villegas, D. Ha, H. Lee, and J. Davidson, "Learning latent dynamics for planning from pixels," in International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR, 2019, pp. 2555-2565.
  12. D. Omrčen, C. Böge, T. Asfour, A. Ude, and R. Dillmann, "Au- tonomous acquisition of pushing actions to support object grasping with a humanoid robot," in IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots. IEEE, 2009, pp. 277-283.
  13. M. Kopicki, S. Zurek, R. Stolkin, T. Mörwald, and J. Wyatt, "Learning to predict how rigid objects behave under simple manipulation," in IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. IEEE, 2011, pp. 5722-5729.
  14. A. Byravan and D. Fox, "Se3-nets: Learning rigid body motion using deep neural networks," in 2017 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). IEEE, 2017, pp. 173-180.
  15. C. Finn, I. Goodfellow, and S. Levine, "Unsupervised learning for physical interaction through video prediction," arXiv preprint arXiv:1605.07157, 2016. · arXiv
  16. P. Agrawal, A. Nair, P. Abbeel, J. Malik, and S. Levine, "Learning to poke by poking: Experiential learning of intuitive physics," arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.07419, 2016. · arXiv
  17. A. Eitel, N. Hauff, and W. Burgard, "Learning to singulate objects using a push proposal network," in Robotics research. Springer, 2020, pp. 405-419.
  18. M. Janner, S. Levine, W. T. Freeman, J. B. Tenenbaum, C. Finn, and J. Wu, "Reasoning about physical interactions with object-centric models," in International Conference on Learning Representations, 2019, pp. 1-12.
  19. F. Paus, T. Huang, and T. Asfour, "Predicting pushing action effects on spatial object relations by learning internal prediction models," in 2020 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). IEEE, 2020, pp. 10 584-10 590.
  20. A. E. Tekden, A. Erdem, E. Erdem, M. Imre, M. Y. Seker, and E. Ugur, "Belief regulated dual propagation nets for learning action effects on groups of articulated objects," in IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). IEEE, 2020, pp. 10 556-10 562.
  21. E. Coumans et al., "Bullet physics library," Open source: bulletphysics. org, vol. 15, no. 49, p. 5, 2013.
  22. M. Macklin, M. Müller, N. Chentanez, and T.-Y. Kim, "Unified particle physics for real-time applications," ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 1-12, 2014.
  23. T. Erez, Y. Tassa, and E. Todorov, "Simulation tools for model- based robotics: Comparison of bullet, havok, mujoco, ode and physx," in 2015 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA). IEEE, 2015, pp. 4397-4404.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Weng, Z., Paus, F., Varava, A., Yin, H., Asfour, T., & Kragic, D.
Affiliations
  • KTH Royal Institute of Technology (SE)
  • Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (DE)
Venue
2021 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2021-09-27
Pages
5741-5748
ISSN
2153-0858 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3133740039
Cited by
17
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3
FWCI
5.15
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robot Manipulation and Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
Keywords
deformable objects, rigid bodies, robotic manipulation, scene dynamics, graph neural networks, simulation environment, long-term forecasting, two-stage prediction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review