Cited by 276AI in cancer detectionRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical ImagingImage Retrieval and Classification Techniques

Automated grading of breast cancer histopathology using spectral clusteringwith textural and architectural image features

Doyle, Scott, Agner, Shannon, Madabhushi, Anant, Feldman, Michael, Tomaszewski, John·2008·2008 5th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro

Abstract

In this paper we present a novel image analysis methodology for automatically distinguishing low and high grades of breast cancer from digitized histopathology. A set of over 3,400 image features, including textural and nuclear architecture based features, are extracted from a database of 48 breast biopsy tissue studies (30 cancerous and 18 benign images). Spectral clustering is used to reduce the dimensionality of the feature set. A support vector machine (SVM) classifier is used (1) to distinguish between cancerous and non-cancerous images, and (2) to distinguish between images containing low and high grades of cancer. Classification is repeated using different subsets of features to compare their performance. The system achieves a 95.8% accuracy in distinguishing cancer from non-cancer using texture-based characteristics (Gabor filter features), and 93.3% accuracy in distinguishing high from low grades of cancer using architectural features. In addition, we investigate the underlying manifold structure on which the different grades of breast cancer lie as revealed through spectral clustering. The manifold shows a smooth spatial transition from low to high grade breast cancer.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/isbi.2008.4541041

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Haralick's features are a well-established set of rotation invariant image statistics used in medical classification across many fields and imaging modalities.

    “Haralick’s features are a well-established set of rotation invariant image statistics that have been used in medical classification issues across many fields and imaging modalities (Doyle et al, 2008; Gnep et al, 2017; Hapsari et al, 2022).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Doyle, S., Agner, S., Madabhushi, A., Feldman, M., & Tomaszewski, J.
Affiliations
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
Venue
2008 5th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2008-05
Pages
496-499
OpenAlex
W2143093135
Cited by
276
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 16
FWCI
9.76
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques
Keywords
breast cancer, histopathology grading, automated grading, spectral clustering, textural properties, Gabor features, support vector machine, manifold structure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review