Automated grading of breast cancer histopathology using spectral clusteringwith textural and architectural image features
Abstract
In this paper we present a novel image analysis methodology for automatically distinguishing low and high grades of breast cancer from digitized histopathology. A set of over 3,400 image features, including textural and nuclear architecture based features, are extracted from a database of 48 breast biopsy tissue studies (30 cancerous and 18 benign images). Spectral clustering is used to reduce the dimensionality of the feature set. A support vector machine (SVM) classifier is used (1) to distinguish between cancerous and non-cancerous images, and (2) to distinguish between images containing low and high grades of cancer. Classification is repeated using different subsets of features to compare their performance. The system achieves a 95.8% accuracy in distinguishing cancer from non-cancer using texture-based characteristics (Gabor filter features), and 93.3% accuracy in distinguishing high from low grades of cancer using architectural features. In addition, we investigate the underlying manifold structure on which the different grades of breast cancer lie as revealed through spectral clustering. The manifold shows a smooth spatial transition from low to high grade breast cancer.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Haralick's features are a well-established set of rotation invariant image statistics used in medical classification across many fields and imaging modalities.
“Haralick’s features are a well-established set of rotation invariant image statistics that have been used in medical classification issues across many fields and imaging modalities (Doyle et al, 2008; Gnep et al, 2017; Hapsari et al, 2022).”
From APOE from astrocytes restores Alzheimer’s Aβ-pathology and DAM-like responses in APOE deficient microglia (2024) · cites this paper as Doyle et al, 2008
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A population-level digital histologic biomarker for enhanced prognosis of invasive breast cancer
Amgad, M., Hodge, J. M., Elsebaie, M. A. T., Bodelon, C., Puvanesarajah, S., Gutman, D. A., Siziopikou, K. P., Goldstein, J. A., Gaudet, M. M., Teras, L. R., et al. (2024) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-023-02643-7 · Cited by 137 · see citing works
High-throughput histopathological image analysis via robust cell segmentation and hashing
Zhang, X., Xing, F., Su, H., Yang, L., & Zhang, S. (2015) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2015.10.005 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Robust application of new deep learning tools: an experimental study in medical imaging
Alzubaidi, L., Fadhel, M. A., Al-Shamma, O., Zhang, J., Santamaría, J., & Duan, Y. (2022) · Multimedia Tools and Applications · doi:10.1007/s11042-021-10942-9 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Preman, P., Moechars, D., Fertan, E., Wolfs, L., Serneels, L., Shah, D., Lamote, J., Poovathingal, S., Snellinx, A., Mancuso, R., et al. (2024) · EMBO Molecular Medicine · doi:10.1038/s44321-024-00162-7 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
- Authors
- Doyle, S., Agner, S., Madabhushi, A., Feldman, M., & Tomaszewski, J.
- Affiliations
- Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
- University of Pennsylvania (US)
- Venue
- 2008 5th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2008-05
- Pages
- 496-499
- OpenAlex
- W2143093135
- Cited by
- 276
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 16
- FWCI
- 9.76
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques
- Keywords
- breast cancer, histopathology grading, automated grading, spectral clustering, textural properties, Gabor features, support vector machine, manifold structure
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review