Tractography density and network measures in Alzheimer’s disease
Open accessAbstract
Brain connectivity declines in Alzheimer's disease (AD), both functionally and structurally. Connectivity maps and networks derived from diffusion-based tractography offer new ways to track disease progression and to understand how AD affects the brain. Here we set out to identify (1) which fiber network measures show greatest differences between AD patients and controls, and (2) how these effects depend on the density of fibers extracted by the tractography algorithm. We computed brain networks from diffusion-weighted images (DWI) of the brain, in 110 subjects (28 normal elderly, 56 with early and 11 with late mild cognitive impairment, and 15 with AD). We derived connectivity matrices and network topology measures, for each subject, from whole-brain tractography and cortical parcellations. We used an ODF lookup table to speed up fiber extraction, and to exploit the full information in the orientation distribution function (ODF). This made it feasible to compute high density connectivity maps. We used accelerated tractography to compute a large number of fibers to understand what effect fiber density has on network measures and in distinguishing different disease groups in our data. We focused on global efficiency, transitivity, path length, mean degree, density, modularity, small world, and assortativity measures computed from weighted and binary undirected connectivity matrices. Of all these measures, the mean nodal degree best distinguished diagnostic groups. High-density fiber matrices were most helpful for picking up the more subtle clinical differences, e.g. between mild cognitively impaired (MCI) and normals, or for distinguishing subtypes of MCI (early versus late). Care is needed in clinical analyses of brain connectivity, as the density of extracted fibers may affect how well a network measure can pick up differences between patients and controls.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
dMRI has been used in numerous studies to understand the effects of AD on white matter microstructure and brain connectivity.
“dMRI has since been used in numerous studies to understand the effects of AD on white matter (WM) microstructure and brain connectivity (Daianu et al., 2013a,b; Nir et al., 2013; Prasad et al., 2013).”
From Diffusion MRI Indices and Their Relation to Cognitive Impairment in Brain Aging: The Updated Multi-protocol Approach in ADNI3 (2019) · cites this paper as Prasad et al., 2013
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 22 · Cited by 35
Research works printed but not linked: 21
- [1]Rose SE Loss of connectivity in Alzheimer’s disease: an evaluation of white matter tract integrity with colour coded MR diffusion tensor imaging Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry 2000 69 n4 528 530 PMC1737121 10990518
- [2]Bozzali M White matter damage in Alzheimer’s disease assessed in vivo using diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry 2002 72 6 742 746 PMC1737921 12023417
- [3]Mueller SG Ways toward an early diagnosis in Alzheimer’s disease: The Alzheimer’s disease neuroimaging initiative (ADNI) Alzheimer’s and Dementia 2005 1 1 55 66 PMC1864941 17476317
- [4]Cook PA An automated approach to connectivity-based partitioning of brain structures MICCAI 2005 164 171 16685842
- [5]Jahanshad N Sex differences in the human connectome: 4-Tesla high angular resolution diffusion imaging (HARDI) tractography in 234 young adult twins IEEE ISBI 2011 939 943
- [6]Iglesias JE Robust brain extraction across datasets and comparison with publicly available methods IEEE TMI 2011 30 9 1617 1634 21880566
- [7]Sled JG A nonparametric method for automatic correction of intensity nonuniformity in MRI data IEEE TMI 1998 17 1 87 97 9617910
- [8]Holmes CJ Enhancement of MR images using registration for signal averaging JCAT 1998 22 2 324 333 9530404
- [9]Jenkinson Improved optimization for the robust and accurate linear registration and motion correction of brain images NeuroImage 2002 17 2 825 841 12377157
- [10]Fischl B Automatically parcellating the human cerebral cortex Cerebral Cortex 2004 14 1 11 22 14654453
- [11]Smith SM Fast robust automated brain extraction HBM 2002 17 3 143 155 PMC6871816 12391568
- [12]Leow AD Statistical properties of jacobian maps and the realization of unbiased large-deformation nonlinear image registration IEEE TMI 2007 26 6 822 832 17679333
- [13]Nir T Connectivity network breakdown predicts imminent volumetric atrophy in early mild cognitive impairment MICCAI - MBIA 2012 41 50
- [14]Aganj I A Hough transform global probabilistic approach to multiple-subject diffusion MRI tractography MIA 2011 15 4 414 425 PMC3115463 21376655
- [15]Basser PJ Microstructural and physiological features of tissues elucidated by quantitative-diffusion-tensor MRI Journal of Magnetic Resonance-Series B 1996 111 3 209 219 8661285
- [16]Aganj I Reconstruction of the orientation distribution function in single-and multiple-shell Q-ball imaging within constant solid angle Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 2010 64 2 554 566 20535807 PMC2911516
- [18]Fritzsche KH Opportunities and pitfalls in the quantification of fiber integrity: What can we gain from Q-ball imaging? NeuroImage 2010 51 1 242 251 20149879
- [19]Dean J MapReduce: simplified data processing on large clusters Communications of the ACM 2008 51 1 107 113
- [20]Rubinov M Complex network measures of brain connectivity: Uses and interpretations NeuroImage 2010 52 3 1059 1069 19819337
- [21]Daianu M Analyzing the structural k-core of brain connectivity networks in normal aging and Alzheimer’s disease MICCAI - NIBAD 2012
- [22]Lee H Discriminative persistent homology of brain networks IEEE ISBI 2011 841 844
- Authors
- Prasad, G., Nir, T. M., Toga, A. W., & Thompson, P. M.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- Venue
- 2013 IEEE 10th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2013-04
- Volume
- 2013
- Pages
- 692-695
- PMC
- PMC4232938
- OpenAlex
- W2074566255
- Cited by
- 35
- References
- 22
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 13.55
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (5u01ag024904-10)
- National Institute on Aging (U01-AG-024904, R01AG040060, U19AG024904)
- National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH097268)
- National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (R01EB008432, P41EB015922)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Keywords
- Alzheimer's disease, brain connectivity, diffusion tractography, fiber density, network topology, mild cognitive impairment, global efficiency, modularity, small-world networks, orientation distribution function, cortical parcellation, disease progression
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review