Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 26COVID-19 diagnosis using AIExplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Localization of Critical Findings in Chest X-Ray Without Local Annotations Using Multi-Instance Learning

Open access
Schwab, Evan, Goossen, Andre, Deshpande, Hrishikesh, Saalbach, Axel·2020·2020 IEEE 17th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI)

Abstract

The automatic detection of critical findings in chest X-rays (CXR), such as pneumothorax, is important for assisting radiologists in their clinical workflow like triaging time-sensitive cases and screening for incidental findings. While deep learning (DL) models has become a promising predictive technology with near-human accuracy, they commonly suffer from a lack of explainability, which is an important aspect for clinical deployment of DL models in the highly regulated healthcare industry. For example, localizing critical findings in an image is useful for explaining the predictions of DL classification algorithms. While there have been a host of joint classification and localization methods for computer vision, the state-of-the-art DL models require locally annotated training data in the form of pixel level labels or bounding box coordinates. In the medical domain, this requires an expensive amount of manual annotation by medical experts for each critical finding. This requirement becomes a major barrier for training models that can rapidly scale to various findings. In this work, we address these shortcomings with an interpretable DL algorithm based on multi-instance learning that jointly classifies and localizes critical findings in CXR without the need for local annotations. We show competitive classification results on three different critical findings (pneumothorax, pneumonia, and pulmonary edema) from three different CXR datasets.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/isbi45749.2020.9098551

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 14 references

Cited by

See all 26

Metadata

Authors
Schwab, E., Goossen, A., Deshpande, H., & Saalbach, A.
Affiliations
  • Philips (United States) (US)
  • Philips (Germany) (DE)
Venue
2020 IEEE 17th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2020-04
Pages
1879-1882
OpenAlex
W3001055052
Cited by
24
References
14
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1
FWCI
4.88
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI) (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • IEEE RESOURCE CENTERS
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › COVID-19 diagnosis using AI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Keywords
chest radiography, multiple instance learning, explainable deep learning, pneumothorax detection, pneumonia detection, annotation-free training, medical image interpretation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.