Cited by 29Privacy-Preserving Technologies in DataDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education

Scaling Neuroscience Research Using Federated Learning

Open access
Stripelis, Dimitris, Ambite, Jose Luis, Lam, Pradeep, Thompson, Paul·2021·2021 IEEE 18th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI)

Abstract

The amount of biomedical data continues to grow rapidly. However, the ability to analyze these data is limited due to privacy and regulatory concerns. Machine learning approaches that require data to be copied to a single location are hampered by the challenges of data sharing. Federated Learning is a promising approach to learn a joint model over data silos. This architecture does not share any subject data across sites, only aggregated parameters, often in encrypted environments, thus satisfying privacy and regulatory requirements. Here, we describe our Federated Learning architecture and training policies. We demonstrate our approach on a brain age prediction model on structural MRI scans distributed across multiple sites with diverse amounts of data and subject (age) distributions. In these heterogeneous environments, our Semi-Synchronous protocol provides faster convergence.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/isbi48211.2021.9433925

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • By collectively building a global model for the prediction of brain age, the FL paradigm in the neuroimaging domain works effectively.

    “By collectively building a global model for the prediction of brain age, the FL paradigm in the neuroimaging domain works effectively.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 23 · Cited by 29

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Dimitris Stripelis and José Luis Ambite, "Semi-syn- chronous federated learning," arXiv:2102.02849, 2021. · arXiv

Authors
Stripelis, D., Ambite, J. L., Lam, P., & Thompson, P.
Affiliations
University of Southern California (US)
Venue
2021 IEEE 18th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2021-04-13
Pages
1191-1195
OpenAlex
W3131695041
Cited by
29
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3
FWCI
2.77
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI) (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Keywords
federated learning, brain research, brain age prediction, structural MRI, data silos, privacy-preserving machine learning, data sharing, data heterogeneity, model convergence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review