Scaling Neuroscience Research Using Federated Learning
Open accessAbstract
The amount of biomedical data continues to grow rapidly. However, the ability to analyze these data is limited due to privacy and regulatory concerns. Machine learning approaches that require data to be copied to a single location are hampered by the challenges of data sharing. Federated Learning is a promising approach to learn a joint model over data silos. This architecture does not share any subject data across sites, only aggregated parameters, often in encrypted environments, thus satisfying privacy and regulatory requirements. Here, we describe our Federated Learning architecture and training policies. We demonstrate our approach on a brain age prediction model on structural MRI scans distributed across multiple sites with diverse amounts of data and subject (age) distributions. In these heterogeneous environments, our Semi-Synchronous protocol provides faster convergence.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
By collectively building a global model for the prediction of brain age, the FL paradigm in the neuroimaging domain works effectively.
“By collectively building a global model for the prediction of brain age, the FL paradigm in the neuroimaging domain works effectively.”
From Applications of Federated Learning; Taxonomy, Challenges, and Research Trends (2022) · cites this paper as [102]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 23 · Cited by 29
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Dimitris Stripelis and José Luis Ambite, "Semi-syn- chronous federated learning," arXiv:2102.02849, 2021. · arXiv
- Authors
- Stripelis, D., Ambite, J. L., Lam, P., & Thompson, P.
- Affiliations
- University of Southern California (US)
- Venue
- 2021 IEEE 18th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2021-04-13
- Pages
- 1191-1195
- OpenAlex
- W3131695041
- Cited by
- 29
- References
- 23
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3
- FWCI
- 2.77
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI) (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Keywords
- federated learning, brain research, brain age prediction, structural MRI, data silos, privacy-preserving machine learning, data sharing, data heterogeneity, model convergence
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review