The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sample Specific Generalized Cross Entropy for Robust Histology Image Classification
Abstract
The accuracy of deep learning classifiers trained using the cross entropy loss function suffers even when a fraction of training labels are wrong or input images are uninformative. Training images and labels for computational pathology are often noisy due to the difficulty in signal localization and certain disease classifications being subjective discretization of the underlying continuums of disease conditions. For training classifiers robust to input and label noise, we propose a modified and sample-specific version of generalized cross entropy loss. We take advantage of the bootstrapping properties in deep learning models in order to design loss functions that are aware of the difficulty of classifying individual samples, due to either the label noise or the lack of a strong visual signal. We carry out extensive experiments to validate our approach by comparing against the models trained using other loss functions. The superior performance of our methodology in all the experiments support the requirement of using robust loss functions for histology image classification.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“discrepancies may also arise when a label assigned at an image level (e.g. a whole slide image (WSI) or a chest x-ray) fails to accurately capture the heterogeneity present locally in the image (e.g. in patches extracted from the WSI or specific areas of a chest x-ray)39,40.”
From A scoping review of robustness concepts for machine learning in healthcare (2025) · cites this paper as [39]
Citations
Cites
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474
Generalized Cross Entropy Loss for Training Deep Neural Networks with Noisy Labels
Zhang, Z., & Sabuncu, M. R. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1805.07836 · Cited by 1,907 · cited 6×
“The parameter γ was estimated on the constraint that its expected value should be equal to 0.7, which is the suggested optimal q value [8].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialImage analysis and machine learning in digital pathology: challenges and opportunities
Madabhushi, A., & Lee, G. (2016) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2016.06.037 · Cited by 1,093
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 16
- 10.1109/ICCV.2019.00041 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.4467/20838476SI.16.004.6185 · DOI
- lyu, 2019, Curriculum loss: Robust learning and generalization against label corruption, arXiv preprint arXiv 1905 10520
- 10.1109/ICCV.2017.211 · DOI
- reed, 2014, Training deep neural networks on noisy labels with bootstrapping, arXiv preprint arXiv 1412 6596
- cheng, 2020, Self-similarity student for partial label histopathology image segmentation, arXiv preprint arXiv 2007 09948
- 10.1016/j.media.2019.101624 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.media.2019.05.010 · DOI
- 10.1186/s12885-019-5392-z · DOI
- 10.4103/jomfp.JOMFP_125_15 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0177544 · DOI
- 10.24963/ijcai.2020/305 · DOI
- 10.1109/CVPR.2017.240 · DOI
- ghosh, 2017, Ro-bust loss functions under label noise for deep neural networks, arXiv preprint arXiv 1712 09482
- 10.1001/jama.2016.17438 · DOI · Paper page
- arazo, 2019, Unsupervised label noise modeling and loss correction, arXiv preprint arXiv 1904 11238
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A scoping review of robustness concepts for machine learning in healthcare
Balendran, A., Beji, C., Bouvier, F., Khalifa, O., Evgeniou, T., Ravaud, P., & Porcher, R. (2025) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-024-01420-1 · Cited by 43
Metadata
- Authors
- Kurian, N. C., Meshram, P. S., Patil, A., Patel, S., & Sethi, A.
- Affiliations
- Indian Institute of Technology Bombay (IN)
- Venue
- 2021 IEEE 18th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2021-04-13
- Pages
- 1934-1938
- OpenAlex
- W3165199804
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 1.39
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Data Classification
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Keywords
- robust loss functions, label noise, histology image classification, computational pathology, bootstrapping
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review