Cited by 19AI in cancer detectionMachine Learning and Data ClassificationAdvanced Neural Network Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Sample Specific Generalized Cross Entropy for Robust Histology Image Classification

Kurian, Nikhil Cherian, Meshram, Pragati Shuddhodhan, Patil, Abhijeet, Patel, Sunil, Sethi, Amit·2021·2021 IEEE 18th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI)

Abstract

The accuracy of deep learning classifiers trained using the cross entropy loss function suffers even when a fraction of training labels are wrong or input images are uninformative. Training images and labels for computational pathology are often noisy due to the difficulty in signal localization and certain disease classifications being subjective discretization of the underlying continuums of disease conditions. For training classifiers robust to input and label noise, we propose a modified and sample-specific version of generalized cross entropy loss. We take advantage of the bootstrapping properties in deep learning models in order to design loss functions that are aware of the difficulty of classifying individual samples, due to either the label noise or the lack of a strong visual signal. We carry out extensive experiments to validate our approach by comparing against the models trained using other loss functions. The superior performance of our methodology in all the experiments support the requirement of using robust loss functions for histology image classification.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/isbi48211.2021.9434169

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. 10.1109/ICCV.2019.00041 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.4467/20838476SI.16.004.6185 · DOI
  3. lyu, 2019, Curriculum loss: Robust learning and generalization against label corruption, arXiv preprint arXiv 1905 10520
  4. 10.1109/ICCV.2017.211 · DOI
  5. reed, 2014, Training deep neural networks on noisy labels with bootstrapping, arXiv preprint arXiv 1412 6596
  6. cheng, 2020, Self-similarity student for partial label histopathology image segmentation, arXiv preprint arXiv 2007 09948
  7. 10.1016/j.media.2019.101624 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/j.media.2019.05.010 · DOI
  9. 10.1186/s12885-019-5392-z · DOI
  10. 10.4103/jomfp.JOMFP_125_15 · DOI
  11. 10.1371/journal.pone.0177544 · DOI
  12. 10.24963/ijcai.2020/305 · DOI
  13. 10.1109/CVPR.2017.240 · DOI
  14. ghosh, 2017, Ro-bust loss functions under label noise for deep neural networks, arXiv preprint arXiv 1712 09482
  15. 10.1001/jama.2016.17438 · DOI · Paper page
  16. arazo, 2019, Unsupervised label noise modeling and loss correction, arXiv preprint arXiv 1904 11238

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 19

Metadata

Authors
Kurian, N. C., Meshram, P. S., Patil, A., Patel, S., & Sethi, A.
Affiliations
Indian Institute of Technology Bombay (IN)
Venue
2021 IEEE 18th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2021-04-13
Pages
1934-1938
OpenAlex
W3165199804
Cited by
19
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1
FWCI
1.39
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Data Classification
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
Keywords
robust loss functions, label noise, histology image classification, computational pathology, bootstrapping

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review