Automatic Segmentation of Rare Pediatric Brain Tumors Using Knowledge Transfer From Adult Data
Abstract
Diffuse midline glioma (DMG) is a rare but fatal pediatric brain tumor. An automatic pipeline to analyze patient MRI can help monitor tumor progression and predict overall survival. Clinical implementation requires automatic segmentations of subregions of DMG. Given the rarity of data, we investigated how pretraining state-of-the-art deep learning models on adult brain tumor data would allow for a knowledge transfer to pediatric data and improve overall segmentation performance. We retrospectively collected multisequence MRI of 45 children diagnosed with DMG (a total of 82 scans with different timepoints). Five-fold cross-validations were performed on the DMG dataset using SegResNet and nnU-Net, each with and without pretraining on the BraTS2021 dataset of 1,251 glioblastoma multiform subjects. Best segmentation results were achieved using nnU-Net with pretraining (Dice scores of 0.859±0.229 and 0.880±0.072 for the enhancing region and the whole tumor, respectively). Our results suggest knowledge transfer from adult brain tumor images can improve pediatric brain tumor segmentation performance. Using pretraining also helped in speeding up training convergence for downstream tasks.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Although a few previous works addressed pediatric brain tumors, their automatic segmentation remains challenging due to a lack of training data and variation in heterogeneous histologic sub-regions.
“Although, a few previous works addressed pediatric brain tumors [10,14,20], their automatic segmentation remains challenging. This is due to a lack of training data and variation in heterogeneous histologic sub-regions including peritumoral edematous/invaded tissue, necrotic core, and enhancing tumor.”
From Model Ensemble for Brain Tumor Segmentation in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (2024) · cites this paper as [20]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Model Ensemble for Brain Tumor Segmentation in Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Capellán-Martín, D., Jiang, Z., Parida, A., Liu, X., Lam, V., Nisar, H., Tapp, A., Elsharkawi, S., Ledesma-Carbayo, M. J., Anwar, S. M., et al. (2024) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-76163-8_20 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
“Although, a few previous works addressed pediatric brain tumors [10,14,20], their automatic segmentation remains challenging.”
BackgroundSelf-citation
- Authors
- Liu, X., Bonner, E. R., Jiang, Z., Roth, H. R., Muhammad Anwar, S., Packer, R. J., Bornhorst, M., & Linguraru, M. G.
- Affiliations
- Children's National (US)
- Nvidia (United States) (US)
- Children’s National Hospital,Sheikh Zayed Institute for Pediatric Surgical Innovation,Washington,DC
- ORCID
- Venue
- 2023 IEEE 20th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2023-04-18
- Pages
- 1-4
- OpenAlex
- W4386352772
- Cited by
- 24
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 9
- FWCI
- 6.29
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Brain Tumor Detection and Classification
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
- Keywords
- diffuse midline glioma, pediatric brain tumors, automated tumor segmentation, knowledge transfer, magnetic resonance imaging, SegResNet, nnU-Net, BraTS 2021, glioblastoma, tumor progression monitoring, overall survival prediction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review