Cited by 24Brain Tumor Detection and ClassificationMedical Image Segmentation TechniquesGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment

Automatic Segmentation of Rare Pediatric Brain Tumors Using Knowledge Transfer From Adult Data

Liu, Xinyang, Bonner, Erin R., Jiang, Zhifan, Roth, Holger R., Muhammad Anwar, Syed, Packer, Roger J., Bornhorst, Miriam, Linguraru, Marius George·2023·2023 IEEE 20th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI)

Abstract

Diffuse midline glioma (DMG) is a rare but fatal pediatric brain tumor. An automatic pipeline to analyze patient MRI can help monitor tumor progression and predict overall survival. Clinical implementation requires automatic segmentations of subregions of DMG. Given the rarity of data, we investigated how pretraining state-of-the-art deep learning models on adult brain tumor data would allow for a knowledge transfer to pediatric data and improve overall segmentation performance. We retrospectively collected multisequence MRI of 45 children diagnosed with DMG (a total of 82 scans with different timepoints). Five-fold cross-validations were performed on the DMG dataset using SegResNet and nnU-Net, each with and without pretraining on the BraTS2021 dataset of 1,251 glioblastoma multiform subjects. Best segmentation results were achieved using nnU-Net with pretraining (Dice scores of 0.859±0.229 and 0.880±0.072 for the enhancing region and the whole tumor, respectively). Our results suggest knowledge transfer from adult brain tumor images can improve pediatric brain tumor segmentation performance. Using pretraining also helped in speeding up training convergence for downstream tasks.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/isbi53787.2023.10230757

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Although a few previous works addressed pediatric brain tumors, their automatic segmentation remains challenging due to a lack of training data and variation in heterogeneous histologic sub-regions.

    “Although, a few previous works addressed pediatric brain tumors [10,14,20], their automatic segmentation remains challenging. This is due to a lack of training data and variation in heterogeneous histologic sub-regions including peritumoral edematous/invaded tissue, necrotic core, and enhancing tumor.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liu, X., Bonner, E. R., Jiang, Z., Roth, H. R., Muhammad Anwar, S., Packer, R. J., Bornhorst, M., & Linguraru, M. G.
Affiliations
  • Children's National (US)
  • Nvidia (United States) (US)
  • Children’s National Hospital,Sheikh Zayed Institute for Pediatric Surgical Innovation,Washington,DC
Venue
2023 IEEE 20th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2023-04-18
Pages
1-4
OpenAlex
W4386352772
Cited by
24
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 9
FWCI
6.29
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Brain Tumor Detection and Classification
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Keywords
diffuse midline glioma, pediatric brain tumors, automated tumor segmentation, knowledge transfer, magnetic resonance imaging, SegResNet, nnU-Net, BraTS 2021, glioblastoma, tumor progression monitoring, overall survival prediction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review