3Pod: Federated Learning-based 3 Dimensional Pothole Detection for Smart Transportation
Abstract
The roadway is the backbone of the country. Bad road conditions can cause vehicles damages and create hazardous driving conditions. Auto damages caused by potholes can add up to thousands of dollars per vehicle. The problem is supposed to be more significant to the auto-driving cars. Therefore, evaluating and maintaining roads of road defects plays an essential role in the economy. Most cities rely on residents to report those conditions. However, aside from being a burden on residents, it may not be an effective method. Automating road defect detection using computer vision techniques would significantly ensure roads remain safe and efficient. Smart cities leverage physical and virtual technologies that rely on sensors and cloud-based communication to improve urban environments. This paper proposes a federated deep learning-based 3 Dimensional (3D) pothole detection (3Pod), which is an intelligent real-time evaluation and reporting platform of road conditions and MRI (Maintenance Responsiveness Indicator) using IoT and Artificial Intelligence technologies. It detects road defects in 3D with size estimation to discern other road objects, including patched potholes, fake road bumps, etc. Furthermore, it provides an avoidability score for each defect to show its risk to commuters on the road and their vehicles. We also propose a crowd-voting technique to calculate MRI (Maintenance Responsiveness Indicator), which helps evaluate maintenance performance.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Authors in [6] used FL for pothole detection, combining 3D-FL and YOLO for accurate defect size estimation.
“Authors in [6] used FL for pothole detection, combining 3D-FL and YOLO for accurate defect size estimation.”
From Privacy-preserving Machine Learning in Internet of Vehicle Applications: Fundamentals, Recent Advances, and Future Direction (2025) · cites this paper as [6]
The model in [6] could accurately distinguish real potholes from patched areas and artificial road bumps, countering adversarial ML attacks while preserving privacy.
“This model could also accurately distinguish real potholes from patched areas and artificial road bumps, countering adversarial ML attacks while preserving privacy.”
From Privacy-preserving Machine Learning in Internet of Vehicle Applications: Fundamentals, Recent Advances, and Future Direction (2025) · cites this paper as [6]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Islam, N., & Zulkernine, M. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503.01089 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“Despite various advances, high computational costs and complexity associated with HE still persist when integrating in PPML [2].”
- Authors
- Alshammari, S., & Song, S.
- Affiliations
- Northern Border University (SA)
- University of Missouri–Kansas City (US)
- Venue
- 2022 IEEE International Smart Cities Conference (ISC2)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2022-09-26
- Pages
- 1-7
- OpenAlex
- W4308086978
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2
- FWCI
- 6.02
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE International Smart Cities Conference (ISC2) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Structural Health Monitoring Techniques
- Keywords
- pothole detection, road defect detection, 3D object detection, federated learning, smart transportation, road maintenance, Internet of Things, vehicle damage prevention, road safety, smart cities
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review