Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 191

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

UCNN: Exploiting Computational Reuse in Deep Neural Networks via Weight Repetition

Open access
Hegde, Kartik, Yu, Jiyong, Agrawal, Rohit, Yan, Mengjia, Pellauer, Michael, Fletcher, Christopher·2018·2018 ACM/IEEE 45th Annual International Symposium on Computer Architecture (ISCA)

Abstract

Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) have begun to permeate all corners of electronic society (from voice recognition to scene generation) due to their high accuracy and machine efficiency per operation. At their core, CNN computations are made up of multi-dimensional dot products between weight and input vectors. This paper studies how weight repetition-when the same weight occurs multiple times in or across weight vectors-can be exploited to save energy and improve performance during CNN inference. This generalizes a popular line of work to improve efficiency from CNN weight sparsity, as reducing computation due to repeated zero weights is a special case of reducing computation due to repeated weights. To exploit weight repetition, this paper proposes a new CNN accelerator called the Unique Weight CNN Accelerator (UCNN). UCNN uses weight repetition to reuse CNN sub-computations (e.g., dot products) and to reduce CNN model size when stored in off-chip DRAM-both of which save energy. UCNN further improves performance by exploiting sparsity in weights. We evaluate UCNN with an accelerator-level cycle and energy model and with an RTL implementation of the UCNN PE. On three contemporary CNNs, UCNN improves throughput-normalized energy consumption by 1.2x ~ 4x, relative to a similarly provisioned baseline accelerator that uses Eyeriss-style sparsity optimizations. At the same time, the UCNN processing element adds only 17-24% area overhead relative to the same baseline.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/isca.2018.00062

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Cited by

See all 191

Metadata

Authors
Hegde, K., Yu, J., Agrawal, R., Yan, M., Pellauer, M., & Fletcher, C.
Venue
2018 ACM/IEEE 45th Annual International Symposium on Computer Architecture (ISCA)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2018-06
Pages
674-687
OpenAlex
W2796675485
Cited by
191
References
8
FWCI
8.77
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: UCNN: Exploiting Computational Reuse in Deep Neural Networks via Weight Repetition. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/isca.2018.00062
The paper
Hegde, K., Yu, J., Agrawal, R., Yan, M., Pellauer, M., & Fletcher, C. (2018). UCNN: Exploiting Computational Reuse in Deep Neural Networks via Weight Repetition. 2018 ACM/IEEE 45th Annual International Symposium on Computer Architecture (ISCA). https://doi.org/10.1109/isca.2018.00062

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.