Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 269

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Hardware Architecture and Software Stack for PIM Based on Commercial DRAM Technology : Industrial Product

Lee, Sukhan, Kang, Shin-haeng, Lee, Jaehoon, Kim, Hyeonsu, Lee, Eojin, Seo, Seungwoo, Yoon, Hosang, Lee, Seungwon, Lim, Kyounghwan, Shin, Hyunsung, Kim, Jinhyun, Seongil, O, Iyer, Anand, Wang, David, Sohn, Kyomin, Kim, Nam Sung·2021·2021 ACM/IEEE 48th Annual International Symposium on Computer Architecture (ISCA)

Abstract

Emerging applications such as deep neural network demand high off-chip memory bandwidth. However, under stringent physical constraints of chip packages and system boards, it becomes very expensive to further increase the bandwidth of off-chip memory. Besides, transferring data across the memory hierarchy constitutes a large fraction of total energy consumption of systems, and the fraction has steadily increased with the stagnant technology scaling and poor data reuse characteristics of such emerging applications. To cost-effectively increase the bandwidth and energy efficiency, researchers began to reconsider the past processing-in-memory (PIM) architectures and advance them further, especially exploiting recent integration technologies such as 2.5D/3D stacking. Albeit the recent advances, no major memory manufacturer has developed even a proof-of-concept silicon yet, not to mention a product. This is because the past PIM architectures often require changes in host processors and/or application code which memory manufacturers cannot easily govern. In this paper, elegantly tackling the aforementioned challenges, we propose an innovative yet practical PIM architecture. To demonstrate its practicality and effectiveness at the system level, we implement it with a 20nm DRAM technology, integrate it with an unmodified commercial processor, develop the necessary software stack, and run existing applications without changing their source code. Our evaluation at the system level shows that our PIM improves the performance of memory-bound neural network kernels and applications by 11.2× and 3.5×, respectively. Atop the performance improvement, PIM also reduces the energy per bit transfer by 3.5×, and the overall energy efficiency of the system running the applications by 3.2×.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/isca52012.2021.00013

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 39 references

Metadata

Authors
Lee, S., Kang, S.-H., Lee, J., Kim, H., Lee, E., Seo, S., Yoon, H., Lee, S., Lim, K., Shin, H., Kim, J., Seongil, O., Iyer, A., Wang, D., Sohn, K., & Kim, N. S.
Venue
2021 ACM/IEEE 48th Annual International Symposium on Computer Architecture (ISCA)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2021-06
Pages
43-56
OpenAlex
W3189166979
Cited by
269
References
39
FWCI
23.28
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hardware Architecture and Software Stack for PIM Based on Commercial DRAM Technology : Industrial Product. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/isca52012.2021.00013
The paper
Lee, S., Kang, S.-H., Lee, J., Kim, H., Lee, E., Seo, S., Yoon, H., Lee, S., Lim, K., Shin, H., Kim, J., Seongil, O., Iyer, A., Wang, D., Sohn, K., & Kim, N. S. (2021). Hardware Architecture and Software Stack for PIM Based on Commercial DRAM Technology : Industrial Product. 2021 ACM/IEEE 48th Annual International Symposium on Computer Architecture (ISCA). https://doi.org/10.1109/isca52012.2021.00013

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.