The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Arts & Bots: Techniques for distributing a STEAM robotics program through K-12 classrooms
Abstract
Arts & Bots is a craft-based robotics program focused on expression and creativity in the service of improving K-12 student technological fluency. In this paper, we describe how we transitioned Arts & Bots from an out-of-school program to a successful classroom tool applicable to many school subjects. We focus specifically on partnerships with teachers and professional development strategies.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Further, by using the design of everyday experiences across settings and social groups, these studies showed that engaging with educational robots has the potential to promote students' creativity (e.g., Giannakos, Jaccheri, & Proto, 2013;Hamner & Cross, 2013;Nemiro, Larriva, & Jawaharlal, 2017).”
From A Systematic Review of Studies on Educational Robotics (2019) · cites this paper as Hamner & Cross, 2013
Citations
Cites
Grit: perseverance and passion for long-term goals
Duckworth, A. L., Peterson, C., Matthews, M. D., & Kelly, D. R. (2007) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.92.6.1087 · Cited by 6,911
Research works printed but not linked: 11
- 2011, AP Computer Science Principles Curriculum Framework Learning Objectives and Evidence Statements
- 2010, Common Core State Standards for Mathematics
- 10.1109/ICRA.2013.6630613 · DOI
- 1999, Being Fluent with Information Technology
- schoenberg, 2001, The Girl Difference Short-Circuiting the Myth of the Technophobic Girl
- 10.1109/MRA.2008.931646 · DOI
- hamner, 2010, The debugging task: Evaluating a robotics design workshop, Proceedings of the AAAI Symposium on Educational Robotics and Beyond Design and Evaluation, 20
- bernstein, 2010, Developing technological fluency through creative robotics (Doctoral dissertation), ProQuest Dissertations and Theses
- 2012, Competition-VEX-VEX Robotics
- hamner, 2008, Robot diaries interim project report Development of a technology program for middle school girls
- hamner, 2008, Robot diaries: Broadening participation in the computer science pipeline through social technical exploration, Proceedings of the AAAI Spring Symposium on Using AI to Motivate Greater Participation in Computer Science, 38
Cited by
A Systematic Review of Studies on Educational Robotics
Anwar, S., Bascou, N. A., Menekse, M., & Kardgar, A. (2019) · Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER) · doi:10.7771/2157-9288.1223 · Cited by 419
Dancing robots: integrating art, music, and robotics in Singapore’s early childhood centers
Sullivan, A., & Bers, M. U. (2018) · International Journal of Technology and Design Education · doi:10.1007/s10798-017-9397-0 · Cited by 275
Metadata
- Authors
- Hamner, E., & Cross, J.
- Affiliations
- Carnegie Mellon University (US)
- ORCID
- Cross, J.
- Venue
- 2013 IEEE Integrated STEM Education Conference (ISEC)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2013-03
- Pages
- 1-5
- OpenAlex
- W2002376476
- Cited by
- 44
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 1.94
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE Integrated STEM Education Conference (ISEC) (publishedVersion)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (Michigan Technological University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Robotics and Engineering
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Teaching and Learning Programming
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Visual Arts and Performing Arts › Art Education and Development
- Keywords
- STEAM education, K-12 classrooms, technological fluency, out-of-school time programs, teacher partnerships, professional development
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
