The DOI matches its Crossref record.
DeepGuard: Deep Generative User-behavior Analytics for Ransomware Detection
Abstract
In the last couple of years, the move to cyberspace provides a fertile environment for ransomware criminals like ever before. Notably, since the introduction of WannaCry, numerous ransomware detection solution has been proposed. However, the ransomware incidence report shows that most organizations impacted by ransomware are running state of the art ransomware detection tools. Hence, an alternative solution is an urgent requirement as the existing detection models are not sufficient to spot emerging ransomware treat. With this motivation, our work proposes "DeepGuard," a novel concept of modeling user behavior for ransomware detection. The main idea is to log the file-interaction pattern of typical user activity and pass it through deep generative autoencoder architecture to recreate the input. With sufficient training data, the model can learn how to reconstruct typical user activity (or input) with minimal reconstruction error. Hence, by applying the three-sigma limit rule on the model's output, DeepGuard can distinguish the ransomware activity from the user activity. The experiment result shows that DeepGuard effectively detects a variant class of ransomware with minimal false-positive rates. Overall, modeling the attack detection with user-behavior permits the proposed strategy to have deep visibility of various ransomware families.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“These scholars frequently contribute to hybrid model architectures that blend statistical learning with deep generative or sequencebased techniques, as reflected in [35,50].”
From Application of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Techniques for Enhanced Insider Threat Detection in Cybersecurity: Bibliometric Review (2025) · cites this paper as [35]
In the citing paper
“Notably, keywords like”
From Application of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Techniques for Enhanced Insider Threat Detection in Cybersecurity: Bibliometric Review (2025) · cites this paper as [35]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 11
- 10.1109/MNET.2016.1600110NM · DOI
- 10.1109/ISI.2017.8004902 · DOI
- 10.1145/3097983.3098052 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.diin.2009.06.016 · DOI
- han, 2011, Data Mining Concepts and Techniques
- 10.1109/ISI.2017.8004894 · DOI
- 10.1145/3129676.3129704 · DOI
- 10.23919/ICACT.2018.8323680 · DOI
- 10.1109/CyberC.2016.17 · DOI
- walker, 2015, Every day big data statistics–2.5 quintillion bytes of data created daily, VCloudNews, 5
- kharaz, 2016, Unveil: A large-scale, automated approach to detecting ransomware, 25th USENIX Security Symposium, 757
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ofori, H. K., Bell-Dzide, K., Brown-Acquaye, W. L., Lempogo, F., Frimpong, S. O., Agbehadji, I. E., & Millham, R. C. (2025) · Symmetry · doi:10.3390/sym17101704 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Ganfure, G. O., Wu, C.-F., Chang, Y.-H., & Shih, W.-K.
- Affiliations
- National Tsing Hua University (TW)
- Venue
- 2020 IEEE International Conference on Intelligence and Security Informatics (ISI)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2020-11-09
- Pages
- 1-6
- OpenAlex
- W3111542209
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4
- FWCI
- 1.88
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE International Conference on Intelligence and Security Informatics (ISI) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Software › Advanced Malware Detection Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Security and Intrusion Detection
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Spam and Phishing Detection
- Keywords
- ransomware detection, user behavior modeling, anomaly detection, three-sigma rule, false positive reduction, WannaCry
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review