Cited by 18Advanced Malware Detection TechniquesNetwork Security and Intrusion DetectionSpam and Phishing Detection

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

DeepGuard: Deep Generative User-behavior Analytics for Ransomware Detection

Ganfure, Gaddisa Olani, Wu, Chun-Feng, Chang, Yuan-Hao, Shih, Wei-Kuan·2020·2020 IEEE International Conference on Intelligence and Security Informatics (ISI)

Abstract

In the last couple of years, the move to cyberspace provides a fertile environment for ransomware criminals like ever before. Notably, since the introduction of WannaCry, numerous ransomware detection solution has been proposed. However, the ransomware incidence report shows that most organizations impacted by ransomware are running state of the art ransomware detection tools. Hence, an alternative solution is an urgent requirement as the existing detection models are not sufficient to spot emerging ransomware treat. With this motivation, our work proposes "DeepGuard," a novel concept of modeling user behavior for ransomware detection. The main idea is to log the file-interaction pattern of typical user activity and pass it through deep generative autoencoder architecture to recreate the input. With sufficient training data, the model can learn how to reconstruct typical user activity (or input) with minimal reconstruction error. Hence, by applying the three-sigma limit rule on the model's output, DeepGuard can distinguish the ransomware activity from the user activity. The experiment result shows that DeepGuard effectively detects a variant class of ransomware with minimal false-positive rates. Overall, modeling the attack detection with user-behavior permits the proposed strategy to have deep visibility of various ransomware families.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/isi49825.2020.9280508

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. 10.1109/MNET.2016.1600110NM · DOI
  2. 10.1109/ISI.2017.8004902 · DOI
  3. 10.1145/3097983.3098052 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/j.diin.2009.06.016 · DOI
  5. han, 2011, Data Mining Concepts and Techniques
  6. 10.1109/ISI.2017.8004894 · DOI
  7. 10.1145/3129676.3129704 · DOI
  8. 10.23919/ICACT.2018.8323680 · DOI
  9. 10.1109/CyberC.2016.17 · DOI
  10. walker, 2015, Every day big data statistics–2.5 quintillion bytes of data created daily, VCloudNews, 5
  11. kharaz, 2016, Unveil: A large-scale, automated approach to detecting ransomware, 25th USENIX Security Symposium, 757

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ganfure, G. O., Wu, C.-F., Chang, Y.-H., & Shih, W.-K.
Affiliations
National Tsing Hua University (TW)
Venue
2020 IEEE International Conference on Intelligence and Security Informatics (ISI)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2020-11-09
Pages
1-6
OpenAlex
W3111542209
Cited by
18
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4
FWCI
1.88
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE International Conference on Intelligence and Security Informatics (ISI) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Software › Advanced Malware Detection Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Security and Intrusion Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Spam and Phishing Detection
Keywords
ransomware detection, user behavior modeling, anomaly detection, three-sigma rule, false positive reduction, WannaCry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review