The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Increasing uplink capacity via user cooperation diversity
Abstract
Mobile users' capacity is limited by the fact that within the duration of any given call, they experience severe variations in signal attenuation, thereby necessitating the use of some type of diversity. We are proposing a new form of diversity, whereby diversity gains are achieved via the cooperation of in-cell users. Results show that, even though the inter-user channel is noisy, cooperation leads not only to an increase in capacity but also to a more robust system, where users' achievable rates are less susceptible to channel variations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Kramer, G., Marić, I., & Yates, R. D. (2006) · Foundations and Trends® in Networking · doi:10.1561/1300000004 · Cited by 282
Cooperation in 4G - Hype or Ripe?
Dohler, M., Meddour, D.-D., Senouci, S.-M., & Saadani, A. (2008) · IEEE Technology and Society Magazine · doi:10.1109/mts.2008.918035 · Cited by 46
Metadata
- Authors
- Sendonaris, A., Erkip, E., & Aazhang, B.
- Venue
- Proceedings. 1998 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (Cat. No.98CH36252)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2002-11-27
- OpenAlex
- W2159616236
- Cited by
- 555
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.79
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Increasing uplink capacity via user cooperation diversity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/isit.1998.708750
- The paper
- Sendonaris, A., Erkip, E., & Aazhang, B. (2002). Increasing uplink capacity via user cooperation diversity. Proceedings. 1998 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (Cat. No.98CH36252). https://doi.org/10.1109/isit.1998.708750
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
