The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Analyzing CUDA workloads using a detailed GPU simulator
Abstract
Modern Graphic Processing Units (GPUs) provide sufficiently flexible programming models that understanding their performance can provide insight in designing tomorrow's manycore processors, whether those are GPUs or otherwise. The combination of multiple, multithreaded, SIMD cores makes studying these GPUs useful in understanding tradeoffs among memory, data, and thread level parallelism. While modern GPUs offer orders of magnitude more raw computing power than contemporary CPUs, many important applications, even those with abundant data level parallelism, do not achieve peak performance. This paper characterizes several non-graphics applications written in NVIDIA's CUDA programming model by running them on a novel detailed microarchitecture performance simulator that runs NVIDIA's parallel thread execution (PTX) virtual instruction set. For this study, we selected twelve non-trivial CUDA applications demonstrating varying levels of performance improvement on GPU hardware (versus a CPU-only sequential version of the application). We study the performance of these applications on our GPU performance simulator with configurations comparable to contemporary high-end graphics cards. We characterize the performance impact of several microarchitecture design choices including choice of interconnect topology, use of caches, design of memory controller, parallel workload distribution mechanisms, and memory request coalescing hardware. Two observations we make are (1) that for the applications we study, performance is more sensitive to interconnect bisection bandwidth rather than latency, and (2) that, for some applications, running fewer threads concurrently than on-chip resources might otherwise allow can improve performance by reducing contention in the memory system.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Accelerating CUDA graph algorithms at maximum warp
Hong, S., Kim, S. K., Oguntebi, T., & Olukotun, K. (2011) · Proceedings of the 16th ACM symposium on Principles and practice of parallel programming · doi:10.1145/1941553.1941590 · Cited by 339
Scalable Computing: Practice and Experience
(2013) · Scalable Computing Practice and Experience · doi:10.12694/issn.1895-1767 · Cited by 280
GPU-Qin: A methodology for evaluating the error resilience of GPGPU applications
Fang, B., Pattabiraman, K., Ripeanu, M., & Gurumurthi, S. (2014) · 2014 IEEE International Symposium on Performance Analysis of Systems and Software (ISPASS) · doi:10.1109/ispass.2014.6844486 · Cited by 142
NVBitFI: Dynamic Fault Injection for GPUs
Tsai, T., Hari, S. K. S., Sullivan, M., Villa, O., & Keckler, S. W. (2021) · 2021 51st Annual IEEE/IFIP International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks (DSN) · doi:10.1109/dsn48987.2021.00041 · Cited by 93
Simulating cortical networks on heterogeneous multi-GPU systems
Nere, A., Franey, S., Hashmi, A., & Lipasti, M. (2013) · Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing · doi:10.1016/j.jpdc.2012.02.006 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Bakhoda, A., Yuan, G. L., Fung, W. W. L., Wong, H., & Aamodt, T. M.
- Venue
- 2009 IEEE International Symposium on Performance Analysis of Systems and Software
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2009-04
- Pages
- 163-174
- OpenAlex
- W1979527452
- Cited by
- 1,663
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 34.97
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Analyzing CUDA workloads using a detailed GPU simulator. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/ispass.2009.4919648
- The paper
- Bakhoda, A., Yuan, G. L., Fung, W. W. L., Wong, H., & Aamodt, T. M. (2009). Analyzing CUDA workloads using a detailed GPU simulator. 2009 IEEE International Symposium on Performance Analysis of Systems and Software. https://doi.org/10.1109/ispass.2009.4919648
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.