The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Social issues in requirements engineering
Abstract
Social issues in requirements engineering are classified according to what groups are involved. Topics discussed include issues within the client organization, requirement team issues, issues between the client organization and the requirements team, and development team issues.>
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The study of democratic methods for gathering and negotiating requirements is a subfield of requirements engineering [30].”
From AI for the Common Good?! Pitfalls, challenges, and ethics pen-testing (2019) · cites this paper as [30]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Cited by
AI for the Common Good?! Pitfalls, challenges, and ethics pen-testing
Berendt, B. (2019) · Paladyn, Journal of Behavioral Robotics · doi:10.1515/pjbr-2019-0004 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Goguen, J. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Goguen, J.A.
- Venue
- [1993] Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering
- Publisher
- IEEE Comput. Soc. Press
- Published
- 2002-12-31
- Pages
- 194-195
- OpenAlex
- W1837146989
- Cited by
- 61
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 3.32
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Software › Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Systems Engineering Methodologies and Applications
- Keywords
- social problems, requirements engineering, client organizations, development teams, stakeholder engagement
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Social issues in requirements engineering. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/isre.1993.324858
- The paper
- Goguen, J. A. (2002). Social issues in requirements engineering. [1993] Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1109/isre.1993.324858
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
