Supervised Machine Learning Algorithms to Detect Instagram Fake Accounts
Abstract
Instagram is extremely popular because many celebrities and their fan pages use Instagram as the platform for them to communicate. Instagram offers many media sharing features and has proven to be the most popular social media platform for promoting many brands. As the most popular platform, Instagram also has fake users. Regrettably, some people do malicious activities using fake accounts such as impersonating artists or influencers, hate comments and spread rumors to become viral. Hence, this research aims to detect Instagram fake users based on the user's profile. There are several stages before account authenticity detection is successful, starting from data pre-processing, selecting a classification model, and classification evaluation. The algorithms that are used to create the supervised machine learning model are Logistic Regression, Bernoulli Naive Bayes, Random Forest, Support Vector Machine, and Artificial Neural Network (ANN). This paper tried two experiments. The first is that the default state of the model has no parameters, and no features are added. Second, to improve the accuracy, new features and tuning parameters were added in the experiment. Models that perform better than other models based on the second experiment with new features and parameters are Logistic Regression and Random Forest, with an accuracy of 0.93.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The proposed model's accuracy (98%) is higher than that of six prior models (93%, 94%, 93%, 96%, 83%, 94%).
“| S. D. Munoz et al62 | 93% |”
From Instagram fake profile detection using an ensemble learning method (2025) · cites this paper as M. J. Ekosputra et al.64
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Instagram fake profile detection using an ensemble learning method
Goyal, B., Gill, N. S., Gulia, P., Alduaiji, N., Shukla, P. K., & J, S. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-03973-x · Cited by 10 · see citing works
- Authors
- Ekosputra, M. J., Susanto, A., Haryanto, F., & Suhartono, D.
- Affiliations
- Binus University (ID)
- ORCID
- Suhartono, Derwin
- Venue
- 2021 4th International Seminar on Research of Information Technology and Intelligent Systems (ISRITI)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2021-12-16
- Pages
- 396-400
- OpenAlex
- W4210951675
- Cited by
- 14
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5
- FWCI
- 2.07
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Seminar on Research of Information Technology and Intelligent Systems (ISRITI) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Spam and Phishing Detection
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Authorship Attribution and Profiling
- Keywords
- user profile features, supervised classification, logistic regression, random forest, feature engineering, parameter tuning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review