Cited by 6Video Surveillance and Tracking MethodsAnomaly Detection Techniques and ApplicationsInfrared Target Detection Methodologies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Unsupervised Anomaly Detection in Traffic Surveillance Based on Global Foreground Modeling

Shi, Hang, Ghahremannezhad, Hadi, Liu, Chengjun·2022·2022 IEEE International Conference on Imaging Systems and Techniques (IST)

Abstract

One of the main challenges facing foreground detection methods in the applications of video analytic, is the continuous detection of the objects after they have stopped moving. In this paper, a novel global foreground modeling (GFM) guided background subtraction method, which is capable of detecting stopped foreground objects, is presented. Specifically, the GFM method, which detects both the moving and stopped foreground objects, guides the background modeling method, which detects only the moving objects, for the purpose of adaptive background updating. The main contributions of the paper are two-fold. First, a novel GFM guided background modeling method is proposed by adaptively updating the background model based on the differences between the two foreground masks produced by the GFM method and a background modeling method, such as Zivkovic's method, respectively. As a result, the proposed method both improves the foreground detection and detects the stopped foreground objects. Second, a boosting strategy is integrated into the proposed method for eliminating the false alarms caused by noise. Real traffic videos are used to evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed method. In particular, experimental results using the real traffic videos from the New Jersey Department of Transportation (NJDOT) show that the proposed GFM guided background modeling method is able to detect stopped foreground objects, such as stopped vehicles, in real time.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/ist55454.2022.9827759

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 29 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. ghahremannezhad, 2020, A real time accident detection framework for traffic video analysis, Proceedings of the Machine Learning and Data Mining in Pattern Recognition - MLDM, 77
  2. faruque, 2019, Vehicle classification in video using deep learning, Proceedings of the Machine Learning and Data Mining in Pattern Recognition - MLDM, 117

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 6

Metadata

Authors
Shi, H., Ghahremannezhad, H., & Liu, C.
Affiliations
  • Innovative AI Technologies,Newark,NJ,USA,07103
  • New Jersey Institute of Technology (US)
Venue
2022 IEEE International Conference on Imaging Systems and Techniques (IST)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2022-06-21
Pages
1-6
OpenAlex
W4286277823
Cited by
6
References
29
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2023: 3
FWCI
0.54
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE International Conference on Imaging Systems and Techniques (IST) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Video Surveillance and Tracking Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Infrared Target Detection Methodologies
Keywords
unsupervised anomaly detection, traffic monitoring, background subtraction, boosting, false alarm reduction, video analysis, real-time video processing, stopped vehicles

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review