Data-driven Extreme Events Modeling for Vehicle Networks by Personalized Federated Learning: Invited Paper
Abstract
Managing queuing latency is crucial to achieve ultra-reliable low-latency communications (URLLC) in the future vehicle networks. In this work, we propose a novel joint power and resource allocation strategy to enhance the worst-case relia-bility by minimizing the network-wide maximum queue length. A constraint of a long-term energy budget is considered, as vehicles must simultaneously ensure other tasks. In addition, vehicle communications are assumed to have a heterogeneous nature and the distribution of extreme events may vary between vehicles, while in this work extreme value theory (EVT) is exploited to model these extreme events. Moreover, personalized federated learning is employed to learn the distribution while handling the heterogeneity among vehicles. Simulation results confirm that the proposed design reduces the length of the worst-case queuing latency and that, in comparison to traditional federated learning, the introduced personalized federated learning approach signif-icantly increases the estimation accuracy of local extreme event distribution without increasing the communication load.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Application of extreme value theory (EVT) and personalized FL in [193] addresses heterogeneous data distributions among vehicles by modeling rare, anomalous events while preserving privacy.
“Another adaptation is the application of extreme value theory (EVT) and personalized FL in [193], which address heterogeneous data distributions among vehicles by modeling rare, anomalous events while preserving privacy.”
From Privacy-preserving Machine Learning in Internet of Vehicle Applications: Fundamentals, Recent Advances, and Future Direction (2025) · cites this paper as [193]
Cites
Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learning
Kairouz, P., & McMahan, H. B. (2021) · Foundations and Trends in Machine Learning · doi:10.1561/2200000083 · Cited by 7,772 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Islam, N., & Zulkernine, M. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503.01089 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Zheng, P., Zhu, Y., Hu, Y., & Schmeink, A.
- Affiliations
- Wuhan University (CN)
- RWTH Aachen University (DE)
- Venue
- 2022 International Symposium on Wireless Communication Systems (ISWCS)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2022-10-19
- Pages
- 1-6
- OpenAlex
- W4309264672
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 1.62
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Symposium on Wireless Communication Systems (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs)
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced Wireless Network Optimization
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Age of Information Optimization
- Keywords
- vehicular networks, ultra-reliable low-latency communication, extreme events, extreme value theory, personalized federated learning, queue length, energy budget constraints, data-driven modeling
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review