Cited by 9Artificial Intelligence in EducationArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationAI in Service Interactions

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Exploring ChatGPT Utilization Among Master's Students in Higher Education

Jahani, Masoumeh, Baruah, Bidyut, Ward, Anthony·2024·2024 21st International Conference on Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training (ITHET)

Abstract

The integration of technology in Higher Education has profoundly transformed student learning, with Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools like ChatGPT playing a pivotal role. ChatGPT offers personalized learning experiences by providing tailored feedback, supporting tasks such as idea generation, text summarization, paraphrasing, and language translation. It enhances group work and peer learning, making education more interactive and accessible, particularly outside of regular classroom hours. Many studies have highlighted how ChatGPT can improve productivity and research efficiency among students. Despite its benefits, the use of ChatGPT raises concerns about digital equity, screen time, and the balance between technology and traditional learning methods. This paper investigates how students in a popular postgraduate programme at the University of York use ChatGPT, focusing on their engagement, experiences, and reliance on AI for coursework and assignments. The study, based on a survey, explores themes such as reasons for using ChatGPT, familiarity, frequency of use, concerns, and perceived helpfulness. Findings reveal that while students appreciate ChatGPT's non-judgmental support and convenience, issues regarding the reliability and accuracy of information persist. The study underscores the need for ethical considerations in using AI tools and highlights their potential to enhance educational experiences.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/ithet61869.2024.10837601

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 10 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Jahani, M., Baruah, B., & Ward, A.
Affiliations
University of York (GB)
Venue
2024 21st International Conference on Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training (ITHET)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2024-11-06
Pages
1-6
OpenAlex
W4406459602
Cited by
9
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 1
FWCI
3.43
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Conference on Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training (ITHET) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › AI in Service Interactions
Keywords
ChatGPT, generative AI in education, master's students, graduate students, AI tool use, student engagement, digital equity, screen time, AI ethics, student perceptions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review