The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Probabilistic decision-making under uncertainty for autonomous driving using continuous POMDPs
Abstract
This paper presents a generic approach for tactical decision-making under uncertainty in the context of driving. The complexity of this task mainly stems from the fact that rational decision-making in this context must consider several sources of uncertainty: The temporal evolution of situations cannot be predicted without uncertainty because other road users behave stochastically and their goals and plans cannot be measured. Even more important, road users are only able to perceive a tiny part of the current situation with their sensors because measurements are noisy and most of the environment is occluded. In order to anticipate the consequences of decisions a probabilistic approach, considering both forms of uncertainty, is necessary. We address this by formulating the task of driving as a continuous Partially Observable Markov Decision Process (POMDP) that can be automatically optimized for different scenarios. As driving is a continuous-space problem, the belief space is infinite-dimensional. We do not use a symbolic representation or discretize the state space a priori because there is no representation of the state space that is optimal for every situation. Instead, we employ a continuous POMDP solver that learns a good representation of the specific situation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Autonomous driving in urban environments: Boss and the Urban Challenge
Urmson, C., Anhalt, J., Bagnell, D., Baker, C., Bittner, R., Clark, M. N., Dolan, J., Duggins, D., Galatali, T., Geyer, C., et al. (2008) · Journal of Field Robotics · doi:10.1002/rob.20255 · Cited by 1,555
Making Bertha Drive—An Autonomous Journey on a Historic Route
Ziegler, J., Bender, P., Schreiber, M., Lategahn, H., Strauss, T., Stiller, C., Dang, T., Franke, U., Appenrodt, N., Keller, C. G., et al. (2014) · IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine · doi:10.1109/mits.2014.2306552 · Cited by 854
Cited by
Planning and Decision-Making for Autonomous Vehicles
Schwarting, W., Alonso-Mora, J., & Rus, D. (2018) · Annual Review of Control, Robotics, and Autonomous Systems · doi:10.1146/annurev-control-060117-105157 · Cited by 972
Navigating Occluded Intersections with Autonomous Vehicles Using Deep Reinforcement Learning
Isele, D., Rahimi, R., Cosgun, A., Subramanian, K., & Fujimura, K. (2018) · 2018 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) · doi:10.1109/icra.2018.8461233 · Cited by 379
Baidu Apollo EM Motion Planner
Fan, H., Zhu, F., Liu, C., Zhang, L., Zhuang, L., Li, D., Zhu, W., Hu, J., Li, H., & Kong, Q. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1807.08048 · Cited by 259
Li, D., Wu, Y., Bai, B., & Hao, Q. (2020) · 2020 IEEE 23rd International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC) · doi:10.1109/itsc45102.2020.9294182 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Brechtel, S., Gindele, T., & Dillmann, R.
- Venue
- 17th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2014-10
- Pages
- 392-399
- OpenAlex
- W2055501135
- Cited by
- 279
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 15.06
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Probabilistic decision-making under uncertainty for autonomous driving using continuous POMDPs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/itsc.2014.6957722
- The paper
- Brechtel, S., Gindele, T., & Dillmann, R. (2014). Probabilistic decision-making under uncertainty for autonomous driving using continuous POMDPs. 17th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC). https://doi.org/10.1109/itsc.2014.6957722
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.