The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Constrained Backward Path Tracking Control using a Plug-in Jackknife Prevention System for Autonomous Tractor-Trailers
Abstract
Jackknifing during tractor-trailer reverse driving presents a major challenge in control system design. In this paper, maneuverability conditions were explicitly derived for tractor-trailer systems that are hitched off-axle. A control safety governor was designed and constructed to guarantee that the system stays within the derived maneuverability conditions under steering rate constraints using any controller. The control safety governor is decoupled from the controller so that it can be used in a plug-in fashion with minimal interference. The performance of the designed system was tested for a neural network controller on an increasingly rigorous path with introduced discontinuities. Results show that the system was able to successfully track the path without jackknifing. The novelty of this work lies in providing a solution that is capable of guaranteeing jackknife prevention for any reverse path tracking controller for tractor-trailer systems.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Moreover, in dense urban environments, the accuracy drops further, and the GPS stops functioning from time to time because of tunnels [109] and high buildings.”
From A Survey of Autonomous Driving: Common Practices and Emerging Technologies (2020) · cites this paper as [109]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 18
- 10.1109/TIE.2013.2240631 · DOI
- 10.1109/WCICA.2010.5554359 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.compag.2011.12.009 · DOI
- 10.1109/WCICA.2012.6358234 · DOI
- bin yang, 2012, Look-ahead path information based receding horizon control for backing-up tractor-trailer systems, Proceedings of the 31st Chinese Control Conference CCC, 4201
- 10.1109/IJCNN.1992.227324 · DOI
- 10.1109/ICEC.1994.349969 · DOI
- 10.1109/IROS.2010.5650489 · DOI
- özgüner, 2011, Autonomous Ground Vehicles
- 10.1109/TRA.2003.820928 · DOI
- 10.1109/TMECH.2013.2261534 · DOI · Paper page
- nilsson, 0, Trailer Parking Assist
- 10.1177/0278364908097588 · DOI
- cheng, 2017, Backward path tracking control for mobile robot with three trailers, International Conference on Neural Information Processing, 32
- 10.1109/FSKD.2009.325 · DOI
- 10.1109/ICRA.2011.5979918 · DOI
- 10.1109/TIE.2015.2455016 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-540-75404-6_45 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Survey of Autonomous Driving: Common Practices and Emerging Technologies
Yurtsever, E., Lambert, J., Carballo, A., & Takeda, K. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2983149 · Cited by 1,889
“in [108] to prevent jackknifing while reversing.”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Hejase, M., Jing, J., Maroli, J. M., Bin Salamah, Y., Fiorentini, L., & Ozguner, U.
- Affiliations
- The Ohio State University (US)
- ORCID
- Maroli, John M.
- Venue
- 2018 21st International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2018-11
- Pages
- 2012-2017
- OpenAlex
- W2904099029
- Cited by
- 21
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 2.56
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Vehicle Dynamics and Control Systems
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Control and Dynamics of Mobile Robots
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Dynamics and Control of Mechanical Systems
- Keywords
- tractor-trailers, autonomous vehicles, neural network controller, trajectory tracking
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review