Cited by 21Autonomous Vehicle Technology and SafetyTraffic and Road SafetyAdvanced Vision and Imaging

MONA: The Munich Motion Dataset of Natural Driving

Open access
Gressenbuch, Luis, Esterle, Klemens, Kessler, Tobias, Althoff, Matthias·2022·2022 IEEE 25th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC)

Abstract

Real-world datasets facilitate the development of autonomous vehicles, especially when they are accessible, diverse, and provide a measure of accuracy. While existing datasets have been accessible and diverse, they cannot provide any measure of accuracy. To estimate the accuracy of the detection of traffic participants in our setup, we repetitively drove through our observation area with a measurement vehicle with highly accurate localization and LiDAR sensors. Our experiments showed an average overall position accuracy of 0.51 m. The combined data of the autonomous vehicle and the elevated camera setup yield a unique dataset. The elevated view acts as a super sensor of the autonomous vehicle with extended range and reduced occlusions. We employ an auto-labeling system on the stationary camera data to extract trajectories with bounding boxes for each traffic participant. These extracted trajectories are smoothed for kinematic feasibility, and corresponding maps for each location are provided. The Munich Motion Dataset of Natural Driving (MONA) shall empower new research in prediction and planning. Making raw data and code available to the public without license restrictions allows the dataset to be further improved using more advanced algorithms.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/itsc55140.2022.9922263

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Offline perception is crucial to train and evaluate planners using high-quality object tracks, but only present in Waymo, MONA and nuPlan.

    “Offline perception [16] is crucial to train and evaluate planners using high-quality object tracks, but only present in Waymo [17], MONA [18] and nuPlan.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gressenbuch, L., Esterle, K., Kessler, T., & Althoff, M.
Affiliations
  • Technical University of Munich (DE)
  • Fortiss (DE)
Venue
2022 IEEE 25th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2022-10-08
Pages
2093-2100
OpenAlex
W4308080967
Cited by
21
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7
FWCI
4.36
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC) (publishedVersion)
  • mediaTUM – the media and publications repository of the Technical University Munich (Technical University Munich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Traffic and Road Safety
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Vision and Imaging
Keywords
autonomous driving, LiDAR, trajectory extraction, auto-labeling, occlusion reduction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review