Cited by 21Advanced Neural Network ApplicationsAutonomous Vehicle Technology and SafetyDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

I Had a Bad Day: Challenges of Object Detection in Bad Visibility Conditions

Rothmeier, Thomas, Wachtel, Diogo, von Dem Bussche-Hünnefeld, Tetmar, Huber, Werner·2023·2023 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV)

Abstract

Automated vehicles must be able to correctly perceive the environment in every conceivable situation with the help of their sensor stack. The resulting data streams are typically processed by algorithms that detect and classify objects in the scene. In order to ensure safe driving, these algorithms are expected to perform with sufficient accuracy even in the harshest weather conditions, such as rain, fog and snow. However, this is not the case for the current generation of object detection models. A sharp drop in performance can be observed as soon as these are exposed to adverse weather situations. This can be attributed to the weak representation of training data in bad visibility conditions and detection architectures that are not designed to handle them properly. To address this problem, we propose three small scale annotated datasets that include challenging adverse weather conditions. We evaluate state-of-the art object detection models on a variety of datasets and quantify the performance drop for each algorithm in adverse weather conditions. To this end, we show that current object detection models suffer from severe performance loss due to adverse weather effects and identify common challenges of object detection in bad visibility conditions.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/iv55152.2023.10186674

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 5 references

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. 10.1109/WACV45572.2020.9093540 · DOI
  2. 10.1109/CVPR.2004.1315077 · DOI
  3. 10.1109/ITSC48978.2021.9565008 · DOI
  4. bijelic, 2019, Recovering the Unseen: Benchmarking the Generalization of Enhancement Methods to Real World Data in Heavy Fog, Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops
  5. 10.1007/s12239-018-0018-z · DOI
  6. 10.1007/978-3-030-58565-5_27 · DOI
  7. 10.1109/CVPR.2017.183 · DOI
  8. hasirlioglu, 2019, A General Approach for Simulating Rain Effects on Sensor Data in Real and Virtual Environments, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles
  9. sakaridis, 2018, Model Adaptation with Synthetic and Real Data for Semantic Dense Foggy Scene Understanding, Computer Vision – ECCV 2018, 11217, 10.1007/978-3-030-01261-8_42 · DOI
  10. 10.1109/ICRA.2019.8793486 · DOI
  11. 10.1109/TIP.2014.2358076 · DOI
  12. 10.1109/ICCV48922.2021.01500 · DOI
  13. 10.1007/s11263-011-0508-1 · DOI
  14. 10.1109/CVPR.2016.350 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1109/CVPR.2019.00895 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1109/ITSC48978.2021.9564505 · DOI
  17. 10.1109/CVPR.2018.00033 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1109/CVPR.2018.00376 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1007/s11263-018-1072-8 · DOI
  20. 10.1109/ICCV.2019.00972 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1109/CVPR.2017.691 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1109/ITSC.2019.8917269 · DOI
  23. 10.1109/CVPR.2018.00352 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1007/s11263-020-01366-3 · DOI
  25. 10.1007/978-3-030-14757-0_5 · DOI
  26. 10.1007/978-3-030-71454-3_13 · DOI
  27. 10.1109/CVPR.2012.6248074 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1109/CVPR42600.2020.01170 · DOI
  29. 10.1109/CVPR.2017.376 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1109/ICVES.2019.8906344 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Rothmeier, T., Wachtel, D., von Dem Bussche-Hünnefeld, T., & Huber, W.
Affiliations
University Of Applied Sciences Ingolstadt,CARISSMA Institute of Automated Driving,Ingolstadt,Germany
Venue
2023 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2023-06-04
Pages
1-6
ISSN
1931-0587 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4385326867
Cited by
21
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 1
FWCI
2.25
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Ministry of Education
  • National Research Council
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
Keywords
object detection, severe weather, autonomous vehicles, annotated dataset, rain, fog, snow, sensor data, driving safety

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review