The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
I Had a Bad Day: Challenges of Object Detection in Bad Visibility Conditions
Abstract
Automated vehicles must be able to correctly perceive the environment in every conceivable situation with the help of their sensor stack. The resulting data streams are typically processed by algorithms that detect and classify objects in the scene. In order to ensure safe driving, these algorithms are expected to perform with sufficient accuracy even in the harshest weather conditions, such as rain, fog and snow. However, this is not the case for the current generation of object detection models. A sharp drop in performance can be observed as soon as these are exposed to adverse weather situations. This can be attributed to the weak representation of training data in bad visibility conditions and detection architectures that are not designed to handle them properly. To address this problem, we propose three small scale annotated datasets that include challenging adverse weather conditions. We evaluate state-of-the art object detection models on a variety of datasets and quantify the performance drop for each algorithm in adverse weather conditions. To this end, we show that current object detection models suffer from severe performance loss due to adverse weather effects and identify common challenges of object detection in bad visibility conditions.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Weather conditions like snow, fog, and heavy rain can obscure visibility, making object detection challenging [78].”
From The YOLO Framework: A Comprehensive Review of Evolution, Applications, and Benchmarks in Object Detection (2024) · cites this paper as [78]
Citations
Cites
Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networks
Ren, S., He, K., Girshick, R., & Sun, J. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2016.2577031 · Cited by 73,472
nuScenes: A Multimodal Dataset for Autonomous Driving
Caesar, H., Bankiti, V., Lang, A. H., Vora, S., Liong, V. E., Xu, Q., Krishnan, A., Pan, Y., Baldan, G., & Beijbom, O. (2020) · 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr42600.2020.01164 · Cited by 7,152
BDD100K: A Diverse Driving Dataset for Heterogeneous Multitask Learning
Yu, F., Chen, H., Wang, X., Xian, W., Chen, Y., Liu, F., Madhavan, V., & Darrell, T. (2020) · 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr42600.2020.00271 · Cited by 2,641
The ApolloScape Dataset for Autonomous Driving
Huang, X., Cheng, X., Geng, Q., Cao, B., Zhou, D., Wang, P., Lin, Y., & Yang, R. (2018) · 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW) · doi:10.1109/cvprw.2018.00141 · Cited by 679
ACDC: The Adverse Conditions Dataset with Correspondences for Semantic Driving Scene Understanding
Sakaridis, C., Dai, D., & Van Gool, L. (2021) · 2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv48922.2021.01059 · Cited by 572
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 30
- 10.1109/WACV45572.2020.9093540 · DOI
- 10.1109/CVPR.2004.1315077 · DOI
- 10.1109/ITSC48978.2021.9565008 · DOI
- bijelic, 2019, Recovering the Unseen: Benchmarking the Generalization of Enhancement Methods to Real World Data in Heavy Fog, Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops
- 10.1007/s12239-018-0018-z · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-030-58565-5_27 · DOI
- 10.1109/CVPR.2017.183 · DOI
- hasirlioglu, 2019, A General Approach for Simulating Rain Effects on Sensor Data in Real and Virtual Environments, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles
- sakaridis, 2018, Model Adaptation with Synthetic and Real Data for Semantic Dense Foggy Scene Understanding, Computer Vision – ECCV 2018, 11217, 10.1007/978-3-030-01261-8_42 · DOI
- 10.1109/ICRA.2019.8793486 · DOI
- 10.1109/TIP.2014.2358076 · DOI
- 10.1109/ICCV48922.2021.01500 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11263-011-0508-1 · DOI
- 10.1109/CVPR.2016.350 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/CVPR.2019.00895 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/ITSC48978.2021.9564505 · DOI
- 10.1109/CVPR.2018.00033 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/CVPR.2018.00376 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s11263-018-1072-8 · DOI
- 10.1109/ICCV.2019.00972 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/CVPR.2017.691 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/ITSC.2019.8917269 · DOI
- 10.1109/CVPR.2018.00352 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s11263-020-01366-3 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-030-14757-0_5 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-030-71454-3_13 · DOI
- 10.1109/CVPR.2012.6248074 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/CVPR42600.2020.01170 · DOI
- 10.1109/CVPR.2017.376 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/ICVES.2019.8906344 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ali, M. L., & Zhang, Z. (2024) · Computers · doi:10.3390/computers13120336 · Cited by 383
Metadata
- Authors
- Rothmeier, T., Wachtel, D., von Dem Bussche-Hünnefeld, T., & Huber, W.
- Affiliations
- University Of Applied Sciences Ingolstadt,CARISSMA Institute of Automated Driving,Ingolstadt,Germany
- ORCID
- Rothmeier, Thomas
- Venue
- 2023 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2023-06-04
- Pages
- 1-6
- ISSN
- 1931-0587 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4385326867
- Cited by
- 21
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 2.25
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Ministry of Education
- National Research Council
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Keywords
- object detection, severe weather, autonomous vehicles, annotated dataset, rain, fog, snow, sensor data, driving safety
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review