Vision-based rain sensing with an in-vehicle camera
Abstract
An intelligent wiper speed adjustment system can be found in most middle and upper class cars. A core piece of this gadget is the rain sensor on the windshield. With the upcoming number of cars being equipped with an in-vehicle camera for vision-based applications the call for integrating all sensors in the area of the rearview mirror into one device rises to reduce the number of parts and variants. In this paper, functionality of standard rain sensors and different vision-based approaches are explained and a novel rain sensing concept based on an automotive in-vehicle camera for driver assistance systems (DAS) is developed to enhance applicability. Hereby, the region at the bottom of the field of view (FOV) of the imager is used to detect raindrops, while the upper part of the image is still usable for other vision-based applications. A simple algorithm is set up to keep the additional processing time low and to quantitatively gather the rain intensity. Mechanisms to avoid false activations of the wipers are introduced. First experimental experiences based on real scenarios show promising results.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The camera-based rain detection system by Gormer et al. [13] is dedicated to raindrop detection and cannot be used for any other image-based applications, such as lane-keeping or traffic sign recognition.
“This system is dedicated to raindrop detection and cannot be used for any other image-based applications, such as lane-keeping or traffic sign recognition.”
From A Review of Detection and Removal of Raindrops in Automotive Vision Systems (2021) · cites this paper as [13]
Camera-based rain-sensing provides benefits over FIR-based ones, in terms of improved detection rate, glare reduction, and detection of other particles like dust or salt on the windshield.
“Camera-based rain-sensing provides benefits over FIR-based ones, in terms of improved detection rate, glare reduction, and detection of other particles like dust or salt on the windshield.”
From A Review of Detection and Removal of Raindrops in Automotive Vision Systems (2021) · cites this paper as [13]
The NIR detection region is relatively small, and system performance degrades with induced infrared beams from the outside environment.
“The detection region is still relatively small, and system performance degrades with induced infrared beams from the outside environment.”
From A Review of Detection and Removal of Raindrops in Automotive Vision Systems (2021) · cites this paper as [13]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 8 · Cited by 43
- Authors
- Gormer, S., Kummert, A., Park, S.-B., & Egbert, P.
- Affiliations
- University of Wuppertal (DE)
- Aptiv (Germany) (DE)
- ORCID
- Kummert, Anton
- Venue
- 2009 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2009-06
- Pages
- 279-284
- ISSN
- 1931-0587 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2163306005
- Cited by
- 43
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 4.30
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image Enhancement Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Precipitation Measurement and Analysis
- Keywords
- in-vehicle camera, raindrop detection, driver assistance systems
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review