Cited by 49Safety Systems Engineering in AutonomyHuman-Automation Interaction and SafetyAutonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Strategy and architecture of a safety concept for fully automatic and autonomous driving assistance systems

Horwick, Markus, Siedersberger, Karl-Heinz·2010·2010 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium

Abstract

As drivers back out of the driving task, when transported automatically by an intelligent car for a longer time, they are not always able to react properly, if a driver take over request occurs. This paper presents two ways, how to deal with this problem within the scope of a functional safety concept. Thereto, the difference between fully automatic and autonomous driving assistance systems is explained. Afterwards two different strategies to reach a safe state in consequence of a system boundary crossing are proposed. In the first case the fall back state is reached by a driver take over, in the second case by an automatic, active fail-safe mechanism. Subsequently the necessary components for monitoring and reaching a safe state and their embedment in a basic, functional architecture of a driving assistance system are described. In this context, special regard is paid to aspects of redundancy as well. In the end it is concluded, that the safety concept proposed here is crucial for guaranteeing enduring safety in an automatically driving car and in consequence for making automatic driving functions commercially ready for serial production.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/ivs.2010.5548115

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. 1968, Convention on Road Traffic, 11
  2. schaller, 2008, Congestion Assistance-Supporting the driver in lateral and longitudinal guidance. System development and customer acceptance, Aktive Sicherheit durch Fahrerassistenz, 3
  3. horwick, 2010, Action Plans for Reaching the Safe State with an Autonomous Congestion Assistant, Aktive Sicherheit durch Fahrerassistenz, 4
  4. isermann, 2005, Fault Diagnosis Systems An Introduction from Fault Detection to Fault Tolerance, 352
  5. maurer, 2000, Flexible Automatisierung von StraBenfahrzeugen mit Rechnersehen, P h D dissertation Institut fur Systemdynamik und Flugmechanik (ISF) Universitat der Bundeswehr Munchen Neubiberg, 41
  6. 10.13109/9783666551468 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/0005-1098(83)90046-8 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • Trustworthy AI: From Principles to Practices

    Li, B., Qi, P., Liu, B., Di, S., Liu, J., Pei, J., Yi, J., & Zhou, B. (2023) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3555803 · Cited by 612

    “In autonomous driving where safety is critical, a fail-safe mechanism like standing still has become an indispensable component in Advanced Driver-Assistant System (ADAS) products [160], and is being researched at a higher level of automation [230].”
    BackgroundMethod

Metadata

Authors
Horwick, M., & Siedersberger, K.-H.
Affiliations
  • Technical University of Munich (DE)
  • Audi (Germany) (DE)
Venue
2010 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2010-06
Pages
955-960
ISSN
1931-0587 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2069355026
Cited by
49
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.96
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Safety Systems Engineering in Autonomy
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
Keywords
driver assistance systems, autonomous driving, functional safety, fail-safe mechanism, redundancy, safety monitoring, vehicle architecture

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review