Constraint-based planning and control for safe, semi-autonomous operation of vehicles
Abstract
This paper presents a new approach to semi-autonomous vehicle hazard avoidance and stability control, based on the design and selective enforcement of constraints. This differs from traditional approaches that rely on the planning and tracking of paths. This emphasis on constraints facilitates “minimally-invasive” control for human-machine systems; instead of forcing a human operator to follow an automation-determined path, the constraint-based approach identifies safe homotopies, and allows the operator to navigate freely within them, introducing control action only as necessary to ensure that the vehicle does not violate safety constraints. The method evaluates candidate homotopies based on “restrictiveness”, rather than traditional measures of path goodness, and designs and enforces requisite constraints on the human's control commands to ensure that the vehicle never leaves the controllable subset of a desired homotopy. Identification of these homotopic classes in off-road environments is performed using geometric constructs. The goodness of competing homotopies and their associated constraints is then characterized using geometric heuristics. Finally, input limits satisfying homotopy and vehicle dynamic constraints are enforced using threat-based feedback mechanisms to ensure that the vehicle avoids collisions and instability while preserving the human operator's situational awareness and mental models. The methods developed in this work are shown in simulation and experimentally demonstrated in safe, high-speed teleoperation of an unmanned ground vehicle.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A safety constraint can be implemented on top of a sophisticated planning module to force hard-coded emergency rules without modifying the inner workings of the planner.
“E.g, a safety constraint [72] can be implemented on top of a sophisticated planning module to force some hard-coded emergency rules without modifying the inner workings of the planner.”
From A Survey of Autonomous Driving: <i>Common Practices and Emerging Technologies</i> (2020) · cites this paper as [72]
Cites
A perception‐driven autonomous urban vehicle
Leonard, J., How, J., Teller, S., Berger, M., Campbell, S., Fiore, G., Fletcher, L., Frazzoli, E., Huang, A., Karaman, S., et al. (2008) · Journal of Field Robotics · doi:10.1002/rob.20262 · Cited by 429 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Survey of Autonomous Driving: <i>Common Practices and Emerging Technologies</i>
Yurtsever, E., Lambert, J., Carballo, A., & Takeda, K. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2983149 · Cited by 1,889 · see citing works
“g, a safety constraint [72] can be implemented on top of a sophisticated planning module to force some hardcoded emergency rules without modifying the inner workings of the planner.”
Background
- Authors
- Anderson, S. J., Karumanchi, S. B., & Iagnemma, K.
- Affiliations
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
- ORCID
- Karumanchi, Sisir B.
- Venue
- 2012 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2012-06
- Pages
- 383-388
- ISSN
- 1931-0587 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1969732712
- Cited by
- 116
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 5.91
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
- Army Research Office
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Robotic Path Planning Algorithms
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Vehicle Dynamics and Control Systems
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
- Keywords
- constraint-based planning, semi-autonomous vehicles, hazard avoidance, vehicle stability control, homotopy classes, human-machine systems, off-road navigation, unmanned ground vehicles, teleoperation, collision avoidance, operator situational awareness
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review