Cited by 116Robotic Path Planning AlgorithmsVehicle Dynamics and Control SystemsHuman-Automation Interaction and Safety

Constraint-based planning and control for safe, semi-autonomous operation of vehicles

Anderson, Sterling J, Karumanchi, Sisir B., Iagnemma, Karl·2012·2012 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium

Abstract

This paper presents a new approach to semi-autonomous vehicle hazard avoidance and stability control, based on the design and selective enforcement of constraints. This differs from traditional approaches that rely on the planning and tracking of paths. This emphasis on constraints facilitates “minimally-invasive” control for human-machine systems; instead of forcing a human operator to follow an automation-determined path, the constraint-based approach identifies safe homotopies, and allows the operator to navigate freely within them, introducing control action only as necessary to ensure that the vehicle does not violate safety constraints. The method evaluates candidate homotopies based on “restrictiveness”, rather than traditional measures of path goodness, and designs and enforces requisite constraints on the human's control commands to ensure that the vehicle never leaves the controllable subset of a desired homotopy. Identification of these homotopic classes in off-road environments is performed using geometric constructs. The goodness of competing homotopies and their associated constraints is then characterized using geometric heuristics. Finally, input limits satisfying homotopy and vehicle dynamic constraints are enforced using threat-based feedback mechanisms to ensure that the vehicle avoids collisions and instability while preserving the human operator's situational awareness and mental models. The methods developed in this work are shown in simulation and experimentally demonstrated in safe, high-speed teleoperation of an unmanned ground vehicle.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/ivs.2012.6232153

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A safety constraint can be implemented on top of a sophisticated planning module to force hard-coded emergency rules without modifying the inner workings of the planner.

    “E.g, a safety constraint [72] can be implemented on top of a sophisticated planning module to force some hard-coded emergency rules without modifying the inner workings of the planner.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Anderson, S. J., Karumanchi, S. B., & Iagnemma, K.
Affiliations
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Venue
2012 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2012-06
Pages
383-388
ISSN
1931-0587 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1969732712
Cited by
116
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 1
FWCI
5.91
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
  • Army Research Office
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Robotic Path Planning Algorithms
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Vehicle Dynamics and Control Systems
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Keywords
constraint-based planning, semi-autonomous vehicles, hazard avoidance, vehicle stability control, homotopy classes, human-machine systems, off-road navigation, unmanned ground vehicles, teleoperation, collision avoidance, operator situational awareness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review