Exploiting 3D semantic scene priors for online traffic light interpretation
Abstract
In this paper we present a probabilistic framework for increasing online object detection performance when given a semantic 3D scene prior, which we apply to the task of traffic light detection for autonomous vehicles. Previous approaches to traffic light detection on autonomous vehicles have involved either precise knowledge of the relative 3D positions of the vehicle and the traffic light (requiring accurate and expensive mapping and localisation systems), or a classifier-based approach that searches for traffic lights in images (increasing the chance of false detections by searching all possible locations for traffic lights). We combine both approaches by explicitly incorporating both prior map and localisation uncertainty into a classifier-based object detection framework, generating a scale-space search region that only evaluates parts of the image likely to contain traffic lights, and weighting object detection scores by both the classifier score and the 3D occurrence prior distribution. We present results comparing a range of low- and high-cost localisation systems using over 30 km of data collected on an autonomous vehicle platform, demonstrating up to a 40% improvement in detection precision over no prior information and 15% improvement on unweighted detection scores. We demonstrate a 10x reduction in computation time compared to a naïve whole-image classification approach by considering only locations and scales in the image within a confidence bound of the predicte…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Contextual knowledge using semantic maps is an important prior for scene understanding.
“Contextual knowledge using semantic maps is also an important prior for scene understanding [82, 2, 35].”
From nuScenes: A Multimodal Dataset for Autonomous Driving (2020) · cites this paper as [2]
Cites
Histograms of Oriented Gradients for Human Detection
Dalal, N., & Triggs, B. (2005) · 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2005.177 · Cited by 33,584 · see citing works
Experience-based navigation for long-term localisation
Churchill, W., & Newman, P. (2013) · The International Journal of Robotics Research · doi:10.1177/0278364913499193 · Cited by 225 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
nuScenes: A Multimodal Dataset for Autonomous Driving
Caesar, H., Bankiti, V., Lang, A. H., Vora, S., Liong, V. E., Xu, Q., Krishnan, A., Pan, Y., Baldan, G., & Beijbom, O. (2020) · 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr42600.2020.01164 · Cited by 7,152 · see citing works
“Contextual knowledge using semantic maps is also an important prior for scene understanding [82, 2, 35].”
Background
- Authors
- Barnes, D., Maddern, W., & Posner, I.
- Affiliations
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Venue
- 2015 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2015-06
- Pages
- 573-578
- ISSN
- 1931-0587 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1512825599
- Cited by
- 37
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 6.88
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/M019918/1)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization
- Keywords
- traffic light detection, autonomous vehicles, semantic priors, classifier-based detection, false positive reduction, computation time reduction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review